ArticleNeurosurgical review2021
A scoring system to discriminate blood blister-like aneurysms: a multidimensional study using patient-specific model.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rebleeding of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm After Admission: A Multidimensional Nomogram Model to Risk Assessment.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Presurgical discrimination of blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) can assist neurosurgeons in clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of BBAs and construct a useful tool to distinguish BBAs. This study reviewed patients with small/median, hemispherical, and wide-necked aneurysms of the internal carotid artery in our institution. BBAs were identified via their intraoperative findings. A hemodynamic analysis was performed using a patient-specific model. The independent risk factors of BBAs were investigated using a logistic analysis. A scoring system was then established to discriminate BBAs, in which its predicting value was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. A total of 67 aneurysms comprising 21 BBAs were enrolled. Comparing features between BBAs and non-BBAs, statistical significances were found in the aspect ratio (AR), height-to-width ratio, aneurysm angle (AA), wall shear stress gradient (WSSG), and normalized wall shear stress average. A multivariate logistic analysis identified AR (OR = 0.29, p = 0.021), WSSG (OR = 1.54, p = 0.017) and AA (OR = 2.49, p = 0.039) as independent risk factors for BBAs. A scoring system was constructed using these parameters, effectively distinguishing BBAs (AUC = 0.931, p < 0.01). Our multidimensional scoring system may effectively assist in the discrimination of BBAs from wide-necked non-BBAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33389344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.