ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
Diagnostic value of serum connective tissue growth factor in rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinically Relevant Biomarkers in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2023Review
- Peripheral Blood Biomarkers for Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review.ACR open rheumatology · 2023Article
- Electrochemical immuno determination of connective tissue growth factor levels on nitrogen-doped graphene.Mikrochimica acta · 2022Article
- Prognostic Value of Lymphocyte-to-White Blood Cell Ratio for In-Hospital Mortality in Infective Endocarditis Patients.International journal of clinical practice · 2022Article
- Diagnostic value of serum connective tissue growth factor in rheumatoid arthritis: methodological issues.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Article
- Response to the letter entitled "Diagnostic value of serum connective tissue growth factor in rheumatoid arthritis: Methodological Issues" by Ghjari et al.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Serum connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is reported to be a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our study aimed to investigate the prevalence of serum CTGF and the association with the clinical features in RA patients. Serum samples were obtained from 180 patients with RA, 168 patients with other rheumatic diseases, including 43 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 34 osteoarthritis (OA), 17 primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), 20 ankylosing spondylitis (AS), 23 psoriatic arthritis (PsA), 6 reactive arthritis (ReA), 20 systemic sclerosis (SSc), and 5 systemic vasculitis (SV), and 64 healthy individuals. The clinical and laboratory data of patients with RA were collected. Levels of CTGF in serum were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Associations between CTGF and the clinical features of RA were analyzed. The positivity of serum CTGF among RA patients (33.89%) was significantly higher than those of SLE (9.3%), OA (0%), AS (0%), pSS (0%), PsA (0%), ReA (0%), SSc (5%), SV (0%), and healthy controls (4.69%) (p < 0.0001). The mean concentration of serum CTGF in RA was also significantly higher than those in other rheumatic diseases and healthy controls (p < 0.001). At the cut-off value of 263.30 pg/ml, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of serum CTGF for RA were 33.89%, 96.55%, 88.41%, and 55.45%, respectively. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody (p < 0.001), rheumatoid factor (RF) (p < 0.001), IgG (p = 0.025), and IgM (p = 0.004) in CTGF-positive patients were higher than those in CTGF-negative patients. Besides, the positive rate of serum CTGF was significantly higher in RA patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) (53.1%, 26/49) than RA-non-ILD patients (26.7%, 35/131, p = 0.003). Serum CTGF, as a novel biomarker, has certain diagnostic value for RA. Further studies are necessary to get more knowledge for the diagnostic performance of CTGF in RA. KEY POINTS: • Serum CTGF, as a novel biomarker, has certain diagnostic value for RA, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of which were 33.89%, 96.55%, 88.41%, and 55.45%, respectively. • Serum CTGF was more common to be positive in RA-ILD patients (53.1%, 26/49) than RA-non-ILD patients (26.7%, 35/131, p = 0.003).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.