Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33389288›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Postoperative Morbidity After Resection of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Report from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG).

Carolyn Nessim, Chandrajit P Raut, Dario Callegaro, Francesco Barretta, Rosalba Miceli, Mark Fairweather, Piotr Rutkowski, Jean-Yves Blay, Dirk Strauss, Ricardo Gonzalez and 17 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Staging Systems and Nomograms for Soft Tissue Sarcoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 20 institutions in 8 countries.

Carolyn NessimDepartment of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. cnessim@toh.ca.
Chandrajit P RautDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Dario CallegaroDepartment of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Francesco BarrettaUnit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Rosalba MiceliUnit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Mark FairweatherDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Piotr RutkowskiDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Jean-Yves BlayDepartment of Medical Oncology, Center Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France.
Dirk StraussDepartment of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ricardo GonzalezDepartment of Surgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Nita AhujaDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Giovanni GrignaniDivision of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy.
Vittorio QuagliuoloDepartment of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Eberhard StoeckleDepartment of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Antonino De PaoliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy.
Venu G PillarisettyDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Carol J SwallowDepartment of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital and Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada.
Sanjay P BagariaDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Robert J CanterDepartment of Surgery, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
John T MullenDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Yvonne SchrageDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Elisabetta PennacchioliDivision of Melanoma, Sarcomas and Rare Tumors, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Winan van HoudtDepartment of Surgery, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy.
Kenneth CardonaDepartment of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Marco FioreDepartment of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro GronchiDepartment of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Guy LahatDepartment of Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCandiolo Cancer Institute · ITCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon · FRCentro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITDana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center · USEmory University · USInstitut Bergonié · FRIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITMassachusetts General Hospital · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USOttawa Hospital · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CARoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · ILThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUC Davis Health System · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate perioperative morbidity after surgery for first locally recurrent (LR1) retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Data concerning the safety of resecting recurrent RPS are lacking.

methodsData were collected on all patients undergoing resection of RPS-LR1 at 22 Trans-Atlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG) centers from 2002 to 2011. Uni- and multivariable logistic models were fitted to study the association between major (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3) complications and patient/surgery characteristics as well as outcome. The resected organ score, a method of standardizing the number of organs resected, as previously described by the TARPSWG, was used.

resultsThe 681 patients in this study had a median age of 59 years, and 51.8% were female. The most common histologic subtype was de-differentiated liposarcoma (43%), the median resected organ score was 1, and 83.3% of the patients achieved an R0 or R1 resection. Major complications occurred for 16% of the patients, and the 90-day mortality rate was 0.4%. In the multivariable analysis, a transfusion requirement was found to be a significant predictor of major complications (p < 0.001) and worse overall survival (OS) (p = 0.010). However, having a major complication was not associated with a worse OS or a higher incidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis.

conclusionsA surgical approach to recurrent RPS is relatively safe and comparable with primary RPS in terms of complications and postoperative mortality when performed at specialized sarcoma centers. Because alternative effective therapies still are lacking, when indicated, resection of a recurrent RPS is a reasonable option. Every effort should be made to minimize the need for blood transfusions.

Indexed as

LiposarcomaRetroperitoneal NeoplasmsSarcomaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorbidityNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID33389288
OpenAlexW3120787751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.