Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33389174›Full record

SynthesisSurgery today2021

Red blood cell transfusions and the survival in patients with cancer undergoing curative surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fausto Petrelli, Michele Ghidini, Antonio Ghidini, Giovanni Sgroi, Ivano Vavassori, Daniela Petrò, Mary Cabiddu, Alberto Aiolfi, Gianluca Bonitta, Alberto Zaniboni and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgery today, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Fausto PetrelliMedical Oncology Unit, Medical Sciences Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy. faupe@libero.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9639-4486
Michele GhidiniMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Antonio GhidiniMedical Oncology Unit, Casa Di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni SgroiSurgical Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.
Ivano VavassoriUrology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.
Daniela PetròMedical Oncology Unit, Medical Sciences Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.
Mary CabidduMedical Oncology Unit, Medical Sciences Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.
Alberto AiolfiDepartment of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, Instituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca BonittaDepartment of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, Instituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Alberto ZaniboniOncology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Emanuele RausaGeneral Surgery 1, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
University of Bergamo · ITUniversity of Milan · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Bergamo OvestCasa di Cura Columbus · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogenic red blood cell transfusions exert a potential detrimental effect on the survival when delivered to cancer patients undergoing surgery with curative intent. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between perioperative allogenic red blood cell transfusions and risk of death as well as relapse after surgery for localized solid tumors. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 2019 for studies reporting the outcome of patients receiving transfusions during radical surgery for non-metastatic cancer. Risk of death and relapse were pooled to provide an adjusted hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval [hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval {CI})]. Mortality and relapse associated with perioperative transfusion due to cancer surgery were evaluated among participants (n = 123 studies). Overall, RBC transfusions were associated with an increased risk of death [HR = 1.50 (95% CI 1.42-1.57), p < 0.01] and relapse [HR = 1.36 (95% CI 1.26-1.46), p < 0.01]. The survival was reduced even in cancer at early stages [HR = 1.45 (1.36-1.55), p < 0.01]. In cancer patients undergoing surgery, red blood cell transfusions reduced the survival and increased the risk of relapse. Transfusions based on patients' blood management policy should be performed by applying a more restrictive policy, and the planned preoperative administration of iron, if necessary, should be pursued.

Indexed as

Erythrocyte TransfusionFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPerioperative CareRiskSurgical Procedures, OperativeSurvival RateCancerMeta-analysisOverall survivalSurgeryTransfusions

Identifiers

PMID33389174
OpenAlexW3120755787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.