Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33389154›Full record

ArticleOecologia2021

Filter-feeders have differential bottom-up impacts on green and brown food webs.

Carla L Atkinson, Halvor M Halvorson, Kevin A Kuehn, Monica Winebarger, Ansley Hamid, Matthew N Waters

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carla L AtkinsonDepartment of Biological Sciences and the Center for Freshwater Studies, University of Alabama, 2109 Bevill Building, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA. carlalatkinson@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6430-7613
Halvor M HalvorsonSchool of Biological, Environmental, and Earth Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, 118 College Dr. #5018, Hattiesburg, MS, 39402, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8094-3142
Kevin A KuehnSchool of Biological, Environmental, and Earth Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, 118 College Dr. #5018, Hattiesburg, MS, 39402, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3527-3271
Monica WinebargerDepartment of Biological Sciences and the Center for Freshwater Studies, University of Alabama, 2109 Bevill Building, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.
Ansley HamidDepartment of Biological Sciences and the Center for Freshwater Studies, University of Alabama, 2109 Bevill Building, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.
Matthew N WatersDepartment of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
University of Alabama · USAuburn University · USUniversity of Central Arkansas · USUniversity of Southern Mississippi · US

Funding

Directorate for Biological Sciences DEB-1831512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrient recycling by consumers can strongly impact nutrient availability for autotrophic and heterotrophic microbes, thus impacting functions such as primary production and decomposition. Filter-feeding freshwater mussels form dense, multispecies assemblages in aquatic ecosystems and have been shown to play a critical role in nutrient cycling. Mussel excretion can enhance benthic primary production and influence algal species composition. However, the role of mussels in brown or detritus-based food webs and species-specific differences has received considerably less attention. Here, using mesocosm experiments, we assessed how three species of freshwater mussels that occupy three different phylogenetic tribes influenced benthic algal accrual, ecosystem metabolism, cotton strip decomposition, leaf litter (Acer saccharum) decomposition, and litter-associated fungal biomass measured as ergosterol. Additionally, we measured mussel excretion and biodeposition rates and assessed the stoichiometry (C:N, C:P, and N:P) of the benthic algae, cotton strips, and leaf litter. In comparison to controls without mussels, generally, mussel treatments had higher benthic algal biomass composed of more diatoms, higher gross primary productivity and net ecosystem production rates, and higher cotton strip tensile strength loss, but there was not a difference in ecosystem respiration rates, leaf litter decomposition rates, or fungal biomass. Benthic algae had lower C:N and higher N:P in mussel treatment tanks and cotton strip C:N was lower in mesocosms with mussels. Our results suggest that nutrient regeneration by mussels most strongly regulates green food webs, with some impacts to brown food webs, suggesting that consumers have interactive effects on microbial functioning in freshwaters.

Indexed as

BivalviaFood ChainAnimalsBiomassEcosystemPhylogenyDecompositionErgosterolExcretionSpecies traitsUnionid

Identifiers

PMID33389154
OpenAlexW3118892590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.