Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33389149›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2021

Cytology samples and molecular biomarker testing in lung cancer-advantages and challenges.

Sule Canberk, Marianne Engels

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. New update to the guidelines on testing predictive biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer: a National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sule CanberkInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 208 4200-135, Porto, Portugal. scanberk@ipatimup.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3736-1323
Marianne EngelsInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62,, 50924, Köln, Germany.
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review presents an overview on molecular diagnostic in lung cancer using cytologic samples. Every patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should be tested for targetable driver mutations and gene arrangements. If a mutation is found, this may open an option for targeted therapy. As most of the NSCLC patients in advanced stage of disease are no candidates for surgery, these tests have to be performed on small biopsies or cytology samples. The most common and treatable gene alterations should be tested in every patient: EGFR, ALK, ROS1. A growing number of other genetic changes with targetable mutations may become treatable in the near future. To find patients who might profit from inclusion into clinical studies, relevant additional markers may be tested in an appropriate context. Another important approach for treatment is immunotherapy of lung cancer, which is guided by status of PD-L1 expression on tumour cells. The use of cytology samples carries considerable advantages: often, DNA of high quality is extracted thus enabling easy and precise analysis, and samples may be easily obtained. In case of effusions, effusion fluid seldom is not aspirated for immediate patient relief, so no additional dedicated procedure is needed. Some challenges exist: If the tumour cell count is low, mutations with a low allelic frequency may be missed. In cellblocks formalin-induced DNA, damage may obviate any DNA analysis. In very cellular smears, FISH may be impossible due to massive overlapping of nuclei. Autofluorescence may impede FISH analysis. Although there is no real universal test for genomic profiling for lung cancer, the pathology laboratory must be prepared to offer different assays on different specimens in order to address turnaround time and optimise detections of difficult tumour alterations such as gene fusions. The data from the literature demonstrate that cytology show consistent results, and it is a good alternative for lung cancer molecular testing.

Indexed as

MutationAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDNA Mutational AnalysisErbB ReceptorsHumansLung NeoplasmsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseBiomarkers, TumorErbB ReceptorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsROS1 protein, humanBiomarkerDriver mutationFluorescence in situ hybridisationNext-generation sequencingNon-small cell lung cancerTBNA

Identifiers

PMID33389149
OpenAlexW3119562444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.