ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2021
Histopathological correlation of cervical biopsy and tissue after excision in patients with precancerous lesions of the cervix.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- miR-627-5p inhibits malignant progression of cervical cancer by targeting ANGPTL4.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2025Article
- Negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) following cervical biopsy diagnosis of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) are precancerous lesion of cervix, with incidence of 1.6 per 1000 for CIN 1 lesion and 1.2 per 1000 for CIN 3 lesion in USA. According to IARC incidence is higher in less developed and developing countries. Taking into account the fact that the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Papanicolaou swab and colposcopy vary, the final diagnosis is made by colposcopically guided biopsy and by excisions of the cervix. AIM OF THE STUDY: Comparing the histopathological findings of cervical biopsy and definitive histopathological findings after cervical excision in precancerous lesions of the cervix in relation to the degree of lesion, age and institution, where the biopsy was performed. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study was retrospective and was conducted on a group of patients who underwent some excision techniques on the cervix after obtaining a histological finding of the cervical biopsy.
resultsIn a total sample of 168 patients, a correlation of histopathological analysis of biopsy material and excision techniques was observed in 62.5% (105/168). This correlation was statistically significant (χ
conclusionA statistically significant accuracy of biopsy was noted in examined group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.