Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33388980›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Analysis of forces during robot-assisted and manual manipulations of mobile and fixed footplate in temporal bone specimens.

Hannah Daoudi, Renato Torres, Stéphane Mazalaigue, Olivier Sterkers, Evelyne Ferrary, Yann Nguyen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mobilization and luxation of the stapes during robot-assisted otosclerosis surgery: force and distance analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Hannah DaoudiService ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Sorbonne Université/AP-HP, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Bâtiment Babinski, 52, Boulevard Vincent Auriol, 75013, Paris, France. hannah.daoudi@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7826-0721
Renato TorresTechnologie et Thérapie Génique de la Surdité, Inserm/Institut Pasteur, Institut de l'Audition, Paris, France.
Stéphane MazalaigueTechnologie et Thérapie Génique de la Surdité, Inserm/Institut Pasteur, Institut de l'Audition, Paris, France.
Olivier SterkersService ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Sorbonne Université/AP-HP, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Bâtiment Babinski, 52, Boulevard Vincent Auriol, 75013, Paris, France.
Evelyne FerraryService ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Sorbonne Université/AP-HP, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Bâtiment Babinski, 52, Boulevard Vincent Auriol, 75013, Paris, France.
Yann NguyenService ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Sorbonne Université/AP-HP, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Bâtiment Babinski, 52, Boulevard Vincent Auriol, 75013, Paris, France.
Inserm · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-19-CE19-0026-02Fondation pour l'Audition (FR) Hearing Institute starting grant 2020 HISG2020Société Française d'Otorhinolaryngologie et de chirurgie de la face et du cou Bourse SFORL 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the forces involved in different manipulations, manual or robot-assisted, applied to the ossicular chain, on normal temporal bones and on an anatomical model of otosclerosis.

methodsThirteen cadaveric temporal bones, with mobile footplates or with footplates that were fixed using hydroxyapatite cement, were manipulated, manually or using a robotic arm (RobOtol®). "Short contact" of a mobile footplate was the weakest interaction on the incus. "Long contact" was the same manipulation held for 10 s. "Mobilization" was the smallest visualized movement of the mobile footplate, or the movement necessary to regain mobility of the fixed footplate. A six-axis force sensor (Nano17, ATI) measured the maximal peak of forces, summation of forces applied, and yank.

resultsMaximal forces during short (~4 mN) and long contact (~15 mN) were similar for manual and robot-assisted manipulations. For manual manipulation, yank measured during long contact was twice as high compared to robot-assisted manipulation: 6 ± 2.4 (n = 5) and 3 ± 1.3 mN/s (n = 5), respectively (mean ± SD, p < 0.02). For mobilization of the mobile footplate, maximal forces during mobilization were similar during manual and robot-assisted manipulations, respectively: 12 ± 2.5 (n = 6) and 19 ± 7.6 mN (n = 7). Compared with mobilization of a mobile footplate, mobilization of a fixed footplate required ~ 60 and ~ 27 times higher maximal forces for manual and robot-assisted manipulations, respectively: 724 ± 366.4 and 507 ± 283.2 mN. Yank was twice as high during manual manipulation compared to robot-assisted manipulation (p < 0.05).

conclusionRobot-assisted manipulation of the ossicular chain was reliable. Our anatomical model of otosclerosis was successfully developed requiring higher forces for stapes mobilization.

Indexed as

Ossicular ProsthesisOtosclerosisRoboticsStapes SurgeryHumansStapesTemporal BoneMobilization forcesOssicular chainOtosclerosisStapesSurgery

Identifiers

PMID33388980
OpenAlexW3120207294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.