Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33388927›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2021

Development of new outcome measures for adult SMA type III and IV: a multimodal longitudinal study.

Giorgia Querin, Timothée Lenglet, Rabab Debs, Tanya Stojkovic, Anthony Behin, François Salachas, Nadine Le Forestier, Maria Del Mar Amador, Gaëlle Bruneteau, Pascal Laforêt and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Giorgia QuerinCentre de Référence Maladies Neuromusculaires Paris-Est, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Neuromyologie, Paris, France.
Timothée LengletDépartement de Neurophysiologie, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Rabab DebsDépartement de Neurophysiologie, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Tanya StojkovicCentre de Référence Maladies Neuromusculaires Paris-Est, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Neuromyologie, Paris, France.
Anthony BehinCentre de Référence Maladies Neuromusculaires Paris-Est, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Neuromyologie, Paris, France.
François SalachasAPHP, Centre Référant SLA, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Nadine Le ForestierAPHP, Centre Référant SLA, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Maria Del Mar AmadorAPHP, Centre Référant SLA, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Gaëlle BruneteauAPHP, Centre Référant SLA, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Pascal LaforêtNeurology Department, Nord/Est/Ile de France Neuromuscular Center, Raymond-Poincaré Hospital, Garches, France.
Sophie BlanchoInstitut Pour La Recherche Sur La Moelle Epinière Et L'Encéphale (IRME), Paris, France.
Véronique Marchand-PauvertLaboratoire D'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.
Peter BedeLaboratoire D'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.
Jean-Yves HogrelInstitute of Myology, Neuromuscular Investigation Center, Paris, France.
Pierre-François PradatLaboratoire D'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France. pierre-francois.pradat@aphp.fr.
Sorbonne Université · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRLaboratoire d’Imagerie Biomédicale · FRPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Myologie · FRInstitut pour la Recherche sur la Moelle Epinière et l’Encéphale · FRUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was the comprehensive characterisation of longitudinal clinical, electrophysiological and neuroimaging measures in type III and IV adult spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) with a view to propose objective monitoring markers for future clinical trials.

methodsFourteen type III or IV SMA patients underwent standardised assessments including muscle strength testing, functional evaluation (SMAFRS and MFM), MUNIX (abductor pollicis brevis, APB; abductor digiti minimi, ADM; deltoid; tibialis anterior, TA; trapezius) and quantitative cervical spinal cord MRI to appraise segmental grey and white matter atrophy. Patients underwent a follow-up assessment with the same protocol 24 months later. Longitudinal comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon-test for matched data. Responsiveness was estimated using standardized response means (SRM) and a composite score was generated based on the three most significant variables.

resultsSignificant functional decline was observed based on SMAFRS (p = 0.019), pinch and knee flexion strength (p = 0.030 and 0.027), MUNIX and MUSIX value in the ADM (p = 0.0006 and 0.043) and in TA muscle (p = 0.025). No significant differences were observed based on cervical MRI measures. A significant reduction was detected in the composite score (p = 0.0005, SRM = -1.52), which was the most responsive variable and required a smaller number of patients than single variables in the estimation of sample size for clinical trials.

conclusionsQuantitative strength testing, SMAFRS and MUNIX readily capture disease progression in adult SMA patients. Composite multimodal scores increase predictive value and may reduce sample size requirements in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Spinal Muscular Atrophies of ChildhoodAdultHumansLongitudinal StudiesMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdult SMAClinical trialLongitudinal progressionMUNIXOutcome measures

Identifiers

PMID33388927
OpenAlexW3119961199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.