Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33388914›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2021

Photoselective sharp enucleation of the prostate with a front-firing 532-nm laser: an innovative surgical technique for benign prostatic hyperplasia-a single-center study of 475 cases.

Yongquan Wang, Zhengchao Liu, Tao Jiang, Xiaozhou Zhou, Zhipeng Chen, Jun Zheng, Dishi Yan, Yuanxiu Zhou, Zhansong Zhou, Wenhao Shen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yongquan WangUrological Institution of the People's Liberation Army, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Zhengchao LiuUrological Institution of the People's Liberation Army, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Tao JiangUrological Institution of the People's Liberation Army, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Xiaozhou ZhouUrological Institution of the People's Liberation Army, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Zhipeng ChenUrological Institution of the People's Liberation Army, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Jun ZhengUrological Institution of the People's Liberation Army, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Dishi YanUrological Institution of the People's Liberation Army, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Yuanxiu ZhouUrological Institution of the People's Liberation Army, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Zhansong ZhouUrological Institution of the People's Liberation Army, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China. zhouzhansong@sohu.com.
Wenhao ShenUrological Institution of the People's Liberation Army, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China. chongqingswh@aliyun.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4410-128X
Army Medical University · CN

Funding

Army Medical University SWH2016ZDCX2008Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing cstc2018jscx-msyb0682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the novel technique of photoselective sharp enucleation of the prostate (PSEP) with a front-firing 532-nm laser and evaluate its efficacy and safety.

methodsA seven-step standardized surgical procedure was established, and PSEP was performed in an en bloc or lobulate manner according to the size of the middle lobe of the prostate. The following clinical data of 583 patients who underwent PSEP in our center from November 2016 to May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed: maximum flow rate (Q

resultsOf the 583 patients, 475 had complete clinical information and were included in the study. The median operation time was 39 min. There were significant improvements in the Q

conclusionsPSEP is effective and safe for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The innovative technique integrates the excellent hemostatic property of the 532-nm laser and the high efficiency of enucleation. It decreases the occurrence of postoperative incontinence associated with "blunt" enucleation of 532-nm laser and eliminates the lack of tissue samples problem associated with photoselective vaporization of the prostate.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyPostoperative ComplicationsProstateProstatectomyProstatic HyperplasiaQuality of LifeUrinary IncontinenceChinaHemostatic TechniquesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan SizeTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomBenign prostatic hyperplasiaEnucleationLaserProstate

Identifiers

PMID33388914
OpenAlexW3119054533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.