Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33388896›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Automated assessment of longitudinal biomarker changes at abdominal CT: correlation with subsequent cardiovascular events in an asymptomatic adult screening cohort.

Peter M Graffy, Ronald M Summers, Alberto A Perez, Veit Sandfort, Ryan Zea, Perry J Pickhardt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Tumor-Derived Polyamines Initiate Fat Wasting in Cancer Cachexia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter M GraffyDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-7175
Ronald M SummersRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Alberto A PerezDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Veit SandfortRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ryan ZeaDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Perry J PickhardtDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. ppickhardt2@uwhealth.org.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · US

Funding

Computer Aided Detection for CT ColonographyZIACL040003 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI SUMMERS, RONALD M. · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Computer Aided Detection for Radiologic ImagesZIACL040004 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI SUMMERS, RONALD M. · 2009 to 2025
$0k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular (CV) disease is a major public health concern, and automated methods can potentially capture relevant longitudinal changes on CT for opportunistic CV screening purposes.

methodsFully-automated and validated algorithms that quantify abdominal fat, muscle, bone, liver, and aortic calcium were retrospectively applied to a longitudinal adult screening cohort undergoing serial non-contrast CT examination between 2005 and 2016. Downstream major adverse events (MI/CVA/CHF/death) were identified via algorithmic EHR search. Logistic regression, ROC curve, and Cox survival analyses assessed for associations between changes in CT variables and adverse events.

resultsFinal cohort included 1949 adults (942 M/1007F; mean age, 56.2 ± 6.2 years at initial CT). Mean interval between CT scans was 5.8 ± 2.0 years. Mean clinical follow-up interval from initial CT was 10.4 ± 2.7 years. Major CV events occurred after follow-up CT in 230 total subjects (11.8%). Mean change in aortic calcium Agatston score was significantly higher in CV(+) cohort (591.6 ± 1095.3 vs. 261.1 ± 764.3), as was annualized Agatston change (120.5 ± 263.6 vs. 46.7 ± 143.9) (p < 0.001 for both). 5-year area under the ROC curve (AUC) for Agatston change was 0.611. Hazard ratio for Agatston score change > 500 was 2.8 (95% CI 1.5-4.0) relative to < 500. Agatston score change was the only significant univariate CT biomarker in the survival analysis. Changes in fat and bone measures added no meaningful prediction.

conclusionInterval change in automated CT-based abdominal aortic calcium load represents a promising predictive longitudinal tool for assessing cardiovascular and mortality risks. Changes in other body composition measures were less predictive of adverse events.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesRadiography, AbdominalAdultBiomarkersHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiomarkersAgatston scoreCardiovascular diseaseImaging biomarkersMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID33388896
OpenAlexW3119992974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.