Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33388855›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2021

Approach for in vivo delivery of CRISPR/Cas system: a recent update and future prospect.

Yu-Fan Chuang, Andrew J Phipps, Fan-Li Lin, Valerie Hecht, Alex W Hewitt, Peng-Yuan Wang, Guei-Sheung Liu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Nanoengineered cargo with targetedActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Therapy for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Immunocompromised Cas9 transgenic mice for rapidMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu-Fan ChuangShenzhen Key Laboratory of Biomimetic Materials and Cellular Immunomodulation, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen University Town, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Andrew J PhippsWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Fan-Li LinShenzhen Key Laboratory of Biomimetic Materials and Cellular Immunomodulation, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen University Town, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Valerie HechtSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3539-3356
Alex W HewittMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Peng-Yuan WangShenzhen Key Laboratory of Biomimetic Materials and Cellular Immunomodulation, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen University Town, Shenzhen, 518055, China. py.wang@siat.ac.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7965-2914
Guei-Sheung LiuMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia. rickliu0817@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3379-724X
University of Tasmania · AUShenzhen University · CN

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1123329National Health and Medical Research Council 1185600Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Biomimetic Materials and Cellular Immunomodulation ZDSYS20190902093409851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) system provides a groundbreaking genetic technology that allows scientists to modify genes by targeting specific genomic sites. Due to the relative simplicity and versatility of the CRISPR/Cas system, it has been extensively applied in human genetic research as well as in agricultural applications, such as improving crops. Since the gene editing activity of the CRISPR/Cas system largely depends on the efficiency of introducing the system into cells or tissues, an efficient and specific delivery system is critical for applying CRISPR/Cas technology. However, there are still some hurdles remaining for the translatability of CRISPR/Cas system. In this review, we summarized the approaches used for the delivery of the CRISPR/Cas system in mammals, plants, and aquacultures. We further discussed the aspects of delivery that can be improved to elevate the potential for CRISPR/Cas translatability.

Indexed as

AnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesHumansImmunityLentivirusPlants, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR/CasGene deliveryGene editingGene therapy

Identifiers

PMID33388855
PMCPMC11072787
OpenAlexW3120466629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.