Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33388820›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2021

Predictive value of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) assessment on the success of internal ureteral stent insertion in cases with obstructing ureteral calculi.

Kemal Sarica, Bilal Eryildirim, Hakan Akdere, M Alı Karagoz, Yavuz Karaca, Ahmet Sahan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kemal SaricaDepartment of Urology, Medical School, Biruni University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Bilal EryildirimKartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Training and Research Hospital, Urology Clinic, Health Sciences University, Mekteb-i Tıbbiye-i Şahane (Haydarpaşa) Külliyesi Selimiye Mah. Tıbbiye Cad. No:38, 34668, İstanbul, Turkey. bilaleryildirim@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-3985
Hakan AkdereDepartment of Urology, Medical School, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey.
M Alı KaragozDepartment of Urology, Medical School, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
Yavuz KaracaKartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Training and Research Hospital, Urology Clinic, Health Sciences University, Mekteb-i Tıbbiye-i Şahane (Haydarpaşa) Külliyesi Selimiye Mah. Tıbbiye Cad. No:38, 34668, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet SahanKartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Training and Research Hospital, Urology Clinic, Health Sciences University, Mekteb-i Tıbbiye-i Şahane (Haydarpaşa) Külliyesi Selimiye Mah. Tıbbiye Cad. No:38, 34668, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the possible role of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) assessment in the prediction of the success for stent placement in cases with obstructing ureteric stones. 227 adult patients with a single unilateral obstructing ureteral stone requiring internal ureteral stent placement were included. In addition to stone size, the ureteric wall thickness at the impacted stone site and the degree of hydronephrosis were also assigned on CT images. Patients were divided into two subgroups: Group 1: patients in whom internal ureteral stent could not be passed beyond the stone and Group 2: patients in whom an internal ureteral stent was passed successfully. The possible relationship between the UWT values and the success of stent placement, degree of hydronephrosis were comparatively evaluated. The majority of the stones were located in the proximal ureter in Group 1 and the degree of hydronephrosis was also higher in these cases. Moreover, while the mean value of UWT calculated on CT images was 4.3 ± 0.9 mm in Group 1, this value was noted to be 2.5 ± 0.8 mm in cases of group 2. A cutoff UWT value of 3.35 mm was highly predictive for the stent insertion and cases with higher values required additional procedures or percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement. UWT value calculated at the obstructing stone site was found to be predictive enough for the likelihood of internal ureteral stent passage with high sensitivity and specificity. This evaluation may enable the urologist to make the best decision for urinary diversion in such cases.

Indexed as

StentsAdultAgedFemaleHumansHydronephrosisMaleMiddle AgedOrgan SizePredictive Value of TestsUreterUreteral CalculiUreteral ObstructionHydronephrosisUreteral stentUreteral wall thicknessUreteric stone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.