ArticleEconomics and human biology2021
Effect of an abrupt change in sexual and reproductive health policy on teen birth rates in Ecuador, 2008-2017.
Article in Economics and human biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the contextualized sexual and reproductive health educational strategy "Rurankapak": a mixed-methods quasi-experimental study among adolescents and young people in Ecuador.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Accelerating Well-being for Adolescents Through Transformative Public Policy: A Framework for Action.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024Article
- The Effects of Mobile Primary Health Teams: Evidence from theWorld development · 2024Article
- How to decrease teenage pregnancy: rural perspectives in Ecuador.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Policies for expanding family planning coverage: lessons from five successful countries.Frontiers in public health · 2024Review
- Effect of an abrupt change in sexual and reproductive health policy on teen birth rates in Ecuador, 2008-2017.Economics and human biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several countries have implemented "family-centered" abstinence-only policies for teenagers, as opposed to encouraging utilization and expansion of reproductive health services and education. Little is known, however, about the effects of these more restrictive policies on adolescent birth rates at the national level or their differential effects by race and ethnicity. The extant literature is even scarcer in low- and middle-income countries. We analyze an unexpected policy change in Ecuador that abruptly reversed course and restricted reproductive health services for teenage women in 2014. We use a canton- and time-fixed effects difference-in-differences analysis of Ecuador's 221 cantons with time-varying controls to analyze the impact of the abrupt policy change on the difference of teen (15-19 years) minus young adult (20-24 years) birth rates. In a difference-in-difference-in-differences analysis, the policy change increases birth rates by 8.5 births per 1000 women in cantons with higher indigenous concentration. Results are robust to changes in the comparison population (young adults vs. women in their late 20 s or in their early 30 s), pre-intervention control periods, population weighting, serial correlation, logarithmic model specification, adjustments for intervention year, definition of indigenous concentration, and potential delays in policy implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.