Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33387683›Full record

SynthesisJournal of biomedical informatics2021

Deep representation learning of patient data from Electronic Health Records (EHR): A systematic review.

Yuqi Si, Jingcheng Du, Zhao Li, Xiaoqian Jiang, Timothy Miller, Fei Wang, W Jim Zheng, Kirk Roberts

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Transformation of Epidemiology in the Age of Artificial Intelligence].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  5. From Integrated Care to Learning Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Multimodal Training to Unimodal Deployment: Leveraging Unstructured Data During Training to Optimize Structured Data Only Deployment.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Predictive value ofFrontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuqi SiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
Jingcheng DuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
Zhao LiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
Xiaoqian JiangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
Timothy MillerComputational Health Informatics Program (CHIP), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.
Fei WangDepartment of Population Health Sciences. Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, NY, USA.
W Jim ZhengSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
Kirk RobertsSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: kirk.roberts@uth.tmc.edu.

Funding

Convalescent Plasma to Limit Coronavirus Associated ComplicationsUL1TR003167 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KARP, DANIEL D, MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2019 to 2023
$45.3M
Open Health Natural Language Processing CollaboratoryU01TR002062 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, LIU, HONGFANG · 2017 to 2021
$7.6M
Finding Combinatorial Drug Repositioning Therapy For Alzheimer'S Disease And Related DementiasR01AG066749 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, ZHENG, WENJIN JIM · 2020 to 2024
$4.4M
Learning Universal Patient Representations with Hierarchical TransformersR01LM012973 · NLM · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Timothy A Miller · 2019 to 2026
$3.5M
Decentralized differentially-private methods for dynamic data release and analysisR01GM118609 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
Natural Language Question Understanding for Electronic Health RecordsR00LM012104 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ROBERTS, KIRK EDWARD · 2016 to 2018
$747k
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002062NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003167NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118609NLM NIH HHS R00 LM012104NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatient representation learning refers to learning a dense mathematical representation of a patient that encodes meaningful information from Electronic Health Records (EHRs). This is generally performed using advanced deep learning methods. This study presents a systematic review of this field and provides both qualitative and quantitative analyses from a methodological perspective.

methodsWe identified studies developing patient representations from EHRs with deep learning methods from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore Digital Library. After screening 363 articles, 49 papers were included for a comprehensive data collection.

resultsPublications developing patient representations almost doubled each year from 2015 until 2019. We noticed a typical workflow starting with feeding raw data, applying deep learning models, and ending with clinical outcome predictions as evaluations of the learned representations. Specifically, learning representations from structured EHR data was dominant (37 out of 49 studies). Recurrent Neural Networks were widely applied as the deep learning architecture (Long short-term memory: 13 studies, Gated recurrent unit: 11 studies). Learning was mainly performed in a supervised manner (30 studies) optimized with cross-entropy loss. Disease prediction was the most common application and evaluation (31 studies). Benchmark datasets were mostly unavailable (28 studies) due to privacy concerns of EHR data, and code availability was assured in 20 studies. DISCUSSION &

conclusionThe existing predictive models mainly focus on the prediction of single diseases, rather than considering the complex mechanisms of patients from a holistic review. We show the importance and feasibility of learning comprehensive representations of patient EHR data through a systematic review. Advances in patient representation learning techniques will be essential for powering patient-level EHR analyses. Future work will still be devoted to leveraging the richness and potential of available EHR data. Reproducibility and transparency of reported results will hopefully improve. Knowledge distillation and advanced learning techniques will be exploited to assist the capability of learning patient representation further.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectronic Health RecordsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsDeep learningElectronic health recordsPatient representationSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33387683
PMCPMC11290708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.