Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33387647›Full record

ArticleMolecular phylogenetics and evolution2021

A phylogeny for the Drosophila montium species group: A model clade for comparative analyses.

William R Conner, Emily K Delaney, Michael J Bronski, Paul S Ginsberg, Timothy B Wheeler, Kelly M Richardson, Brooke Peckenpaugh, Kevin J Kim, Masayoshi Watada, Ary A Hoffmann and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pervasive effects ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Temperature-sensitive cytoplasmic incompatibility across divergentbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Retention of a singlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Rapid host switching ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparative analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

William R ConnerDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA(1).
Emily K DelaneyDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Michael J BronskiDepartment of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Paul S GinsbergDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA(1).
Timothy B WheelerDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA(1).
Kelly M RichardsonBio21 Institute, School of BioScience, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Brooke PeckenpaughDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA(1).
Kevin J KimDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Masayoshi WatadaGraduate School of Science and Engineering, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan.
Ary A HoffmannBio21 Institute, School of BioScience, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Michael B EisenDepartment of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Artyom KoppDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Brandon S CooperDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA(1).
Michael TurelliDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address: mturelli@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

Molecular Genetics of Evolutionary InnovationsR35GM122592 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ARTYOM KOPP · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
The evolutionary genetics and genomics of Wolbachia effects on host physiologyR35GM124701 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI Brandon S. Cooper · 2017 to 2026
$3.9M
Evolution of interactions between Wolbachia and its hosts: Drosophila model systeR01GM104325 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI TURELLI, MICHAEL · 2013 to 2016
$1.6M
The molecular origin of sex-specific gene regulationF32GM120893 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DELANEY, EMILY KAY · 2017 to 2017
$57k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM120893NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104325NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122592NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Drosophila montium species group is a clade of 94 named species, closely related to the model species D. melanogaster. The montium species group is distributed over a broad geographic range throughout Asia, Africa, and Australasia. Species of this group possess a wide range of morphologies, mating behaviors, and endosymbiont associations, making this clade useful for comparative analyses. We use genomic data from 42 available species to estimate the phylogeny and relative divergence times within the montium species group, and its relative divergence time from D. melanogaster. To assess the robustness of our phylogenetic inferences, we use 3 non-overlapping sets of 20 single-copy coding sequences and analyze all 60 genes with both Bayesian and maximum likelihood methods. Our analyses support monophyly of the group. Apart from the uncertain placement of a single species, D. baimaii, our analyses also support the monophyly of all seven subgroups proposed within the montium group. Our phylograms and relative chronograms provide a highly resolved species tree, with discordance restricted to estimates of relatively short branches deep in the tree. In contrast, age estimates for the montium crown group, relative to its divergence from D. melanogaster, depend critically on prior assumptions concerning variation in rates of molecular evolution across branches, and hence have not been reliably determined. We discuss methodological issues that limit phylogenetic resolution - even when complete genome sequences are available - as well as the utility of the current phylogeny for understanding the evolutionary and biogeographic history of this clade.

Indexed as

AnimalsBayes TheoremDNADrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEvolution, MolecularPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNADNADrosophila ProteinsBayesian inferenceBiogeographyChronogramsDrosophila phylogenyMaximum likelihood inferencePhylogenetic discordance

Identifiers

PMID33387647
PMCPMC7946709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.