ArticleJournal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
Peanut butter as an alternative dose delivery method to prevent strain-dependent orogastric gavage-induced stress in mouse teratogenicity studies.
Article in Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial transcriptomic profiling uncovers the molecular effects of the neurotoxicant polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the brains of adult mice.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Resveratrol therapy modulates inflammatory biomarkers and reverses mechanical allodynia in rats subjected to a temporomandibular joint arthritis model.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
- Cuprizone in Peanut Butter: An Alternative Method of Cuprizone Administration to Model Demyelination of the Central Nervous System.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026Article
- Inhibition of BET proteins modulates amyloid-beta accumulation and cognitive performance in middle-aged mice prenatally exposed to maternal immune activation.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025Article
- First Demonstration ofJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAnimal-based studies are essential for assessing toxicity to environmental pollutants, especially when the potential targets are specific developmental time points, teratogenic, or multi-organ systems that cannot be modeled in vitro. Orogastric gavage is a widely used technique for exposure because of its increased accuracy of dose administration over free feeding. However, repeated use of this method has been reported to cause physiological stress on the exposed animals that could interfere with interpretation of results. Previous studies have shown that genetic background also contributes to the level of stress and can affect individual response.
methodsTo evaluate the impact of stress on repeated orogastric gavage, we exposed C67BL/6J and 129S1/SvImJ inbred mouse strains to 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), a potent xenobiotic that has been extensively studied in vivo. Pregnant females were dosed for ten days after mating using orogastric gavage with olive oil as vehicle or through diet using peanut butter as vehicle. Serum corticosterone levels, body weight, and reproduction endpoints were measured to evaluate levels of stress induced by the dosing technique.
resultsThe levels of stress caused by orogastric gavage was strongly dependent on strain background and on the phenotypic endpoint. Orogastric gavage-induced stress was more detrimental in 129S1/SvlmJ pregnant female mice than in C57BL/6J.
conclusionThese results show that administration of xenobiotics via controlled diet can improve the reproducibility and rigor of exposure studies requiring orogastric delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.