Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33387498›Full record

Observational studyThe Lancet. Oncology2021

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic cancers: a prospective, registry-based, single-arm, observational, evaluation study.

Anastasia Chalkidou, Thomas Macmillan, Mariusz T Grzeda, Janet Peacock, Jennifer Summers, Saskia Eddy, Bola Coker, Hannah Patrick, Helen Powell, Lee Berry and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Lancet. Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
37.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Clinical practice guidelines for esophagogastric junction cancer: Upper GI Oncology Summit 2023.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Anastasia ChalkidouKing's Technology Evaluation Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. Electronic address: anastasia.chalkidou@kcl.ac.uk.
Thomas MacmillanKing's Technology Evaluation Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Mariusz T GrzedaKing's Technology Evaluation Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Janet PeacockSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Jennifer SummersSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Saskia EddySchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Bola CokerSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Hannah PatrickNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, UK.
Helen PowellNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, UK.
Lee BerryNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, UK.
Gareth WebsterDepartment of Medical Physics, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Worcester, UK.
Peter OstlerMount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
Peter D DickinsonClinical Oncology Department, St James's University Hospital and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Matthew Q HattonClinical Oncology Department, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Ann HenryClinical Oncology Department, St James's University Hospital and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Stephen KeevilKing's Technology Evaluation Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Maria A HawkinsDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Nick SlevinThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Nicholas van AsThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
King's College London · GBNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBMount Vernon Cancer Centre · GBNational Health Service · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBWeston Park Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is increasingly being used to treat oligometastatic cancers, but high-level evidence to provide a basis for policy making is scarce. Additional evidence from a real-world setting is required. We present the results of a national study of patients with extracranial oligometastases undergoing SABR, representing the largest dataset, to our knowledge, on outcomes in this population so far.

methodsIn 2015, National Health Service (NHS) England launched a Commissioning through Evaluation scheme that funded a prospective, registry-based, single-arm, observational, evaluation study of patients with solid cancer and extracranial oligometastases treated with SABR. Prescribed doses ranged from 24-60 Gy administered in three to eight fractions. The study was done at 17 NHS radiotherapy centres in England. Patients were eligible for the scheme if aged 18 years or older with confirmed primary carcinoma (excluding haematological malignancies), one to three extracranial metastatic lesions, a disease-free interval from primary tumour development to metastases of longer than 6 months (with the exception of synchronous colorectal liver metastases), a WHO performance status of 2 or lower, and a life expectancy of at least 6 months. The primary outcome was overall survival at 1 year and 2 years from the start of SABR treatment. The study is now completed.

findingsBetween June 15, 2015, and Jan 30, 2019, 1422 patients were recruited from 17 hospitals in England. The median age of the patients was 69 years (IQR 62-76), and the most common primary tumour was prostate cancer (406 [28·6%] patients). Median follow-up was 13 months (IQR 6-23). Overall survival was 92·3% (95% CI 90·5-93·9) at 1 year and 79·2% (76·0-82·1) at 2 years. The most common grade 3 adverse event was fatigue (28 [2·0%] of 1422 patients) and the most common serious (grade 4) event was increased liver enzymes (nine [0·6%]). Notreatment-related deaths were reported.

interpretationIn patients with extracranial oligometastatic cancer, use of SABR was associated with high overall survival and low toxicity. 'The study findings complement existing evidence from a randomised, phase 2 trial, and represent high-level, real-world evidence supporting the use of SABR in this patient cohort, with a phase 3 randomised, controlled trial to confirm these findings underway. Based on the selection criteria in this study, SABR was commissioned by NHS England in March, 2020, as a treatment option for patients with oligometastatic disease.

fundingNHS England Commissioning through Evaluation scheme.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinomaEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRegistriesState MedicineTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33387498
OpenAlexW3115319505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.