Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33387389›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2021

An Analysis of Anatomy Education Before and During Covid-19: May-August 2020.

Derek J Harmon, Stefanie M Attardi, Malli Barremkala, Danielle C Bentley, Kirsten M Brown, Jennifer F Dennis, Haviva M Goldman, Kelly M Harrell, Barbie A Klein, Christopher J Ramnanan and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Derek J HarmonDepartment of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3958-9468
Stefanie M AttardiDepartment of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3291-490X
Malli BarremkalaDepartment of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6211-5338
Danielle C BentleyDivision of Anatomy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4675-6036
Kirsten M BrownDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9425-7672
Jennifer F DennisDepartment of Anatomy, Kansas City University, Joplin, Missouri.
Haviva M GoldmanDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kelly M HarrellDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
Barbie A KleinDepartment of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Christopher J RamnananDepartment of Innovation in Medical Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9140-9439
Joan T RichtsmeierDepartment of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Gary J FarkasDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5482-6049
Oakland University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USDrexel University · USGeorge Washington University · USMissouri Southern State University · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) created unparalleled challenges to anatomy education. Gross anatomy education has been particularly impacted given the traditional in-person format of didactic instruction and/or laboratory component(s). To assess the changes in gross anatomy lecture and laboratory instruction, assessment, and teaching resources utilized as a result of Covid-19, a survey was distributed to gross anatomy educators through professional associations and listservs. Of the 67 survey responses received for the May-August 2020 academic period, 84% were from United States (US) institutions, while 16% were internationally based. Respondents indicated that in-person lecture decreased during Covid-19 (before: 76%, during: 8%, P < 0.001) and use of cadaver materials declined (before: 76 ± 33%, during: 34 ± 43%, P < 0.001). The use of cadaver materials in laboratories decreased during Covid-19 across academic programs, stand-alone and integrated anatomy courses, and private and public institutions (P ≤ 0.004). Before Covid-19, cadaveric materials used in laboratories were greater among professional health programs relative to medical and undergraduate programs (P ≤ 0.03) and among stand-alone relative to integrated anatomy courses (P ≤ 0.03). Furthermore, computer-based assessment increased (P < 0.001) and assessment materials changed from cadaveric material to images (P < 0.03) during Covid-19, even though assessment structure was not different (P > 0.05). The use of digital teaching resources increased during Covid-19 (P < 0.001), with reports of increased use of in-house created content, BlueLink, and Complete Anatomy software (P < 0.05). While primarily representing US institutions, this study provided evidence of how anatomy educators adapted their courses, largely through virtual mediums, and modified laboratory protocols during the initial emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionEducation, DistanceTeachingAnatomyCadaverCOVID-19CurriculumDissectionEducational MeasurementHumansModels, EducationalSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatescoronavirusCovid-19gross anatomy educationintegrated curriculumlaboratorylecturemedical educationonline anatomyremote teachingstand-alone coursesvirtual anatomy

Identifiers

PMID33387389
OpenAlexW3116058868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.