Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33387299›Full record

ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2021

Monitoring the Power of Child-Targeted Food Packaging: a Review of the Literature.

Charlene Elliott, Emily Truman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current nutrition reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charlene ElliottDepartment of Communication, Media and Film, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. charlene.elliott@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2615-2144
Emily TrumanDepartment of Communication, Media and Film, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewGiven the need to limit unhealthy food marketing to children, more information is required around strategies for its monitoring. Child-directed food packaging, in particular, requires special consideration: packaging drives decision-making at the point-of-sale and is a powerful means of capturing children's attention. This review examines and summarizes literature that monitors the "power" (persuasive techniques) of packaging, in order to assess what these broader strategies contribute to monitoring child-targeted packaged foods. RECENT

findingsEleven relevant studies on monitoring (spanning food, tobacco, and cannabis packaging) were examined. Strategies regarding the precise measurement indicators, accurate data collection and management, and time trends analysis were identified; from this, a set of criteria for monitoring the power of packaging in retail settings was proposed. Examining literature on the monitoring of the "power" of packaging reveals the paucity of research in this area. This review details how packaging features can be effectively tracked in different contexts and over time.

Indexed as

AdvertisingFood PackagingFoodFood IndustryHumansMarketingChildFood advertisingFood marketingMonitoringPackagingPolicy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.