Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33387291›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021

Feasibility of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment for cancer patients using electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) in daily clinical practice.

Guillaume Mouillet, Antoine Falcoz, Joëlle Fritzsch, Hamadi Almotlak, Pascale Jacoulet, Xavier Pivot, Cristian Villanueva, Laura Mansi, Stefano Kim, Elsa Curtit and 12 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Barriers and enablers for health system reform.Frontiers in health services · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Surgeon's Field Guide to Value-Based Specialty Care.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Impact of assessment frequency of patient-reported outcomes: an observational study using an eHealth platform in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Observational
  16. Using feedback tools to enhance the quality and experience of care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guillaume MouilletMethodological and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France. gmouillet@chu-besancon.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2288-7461
Antoine FalcozMethodological and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
Joëlle FritzschMethodological and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
Hamadi AlmotlakDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.
Pascale JacouletRespiratory Medicine Department, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
Xavier PivotInstitut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France.
Cristian VillanuevaCentre de Cancérologie de Grand Montpellier, 34040, Montpellier, France.
Laura MansiDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.
Stefano KimDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.
Elsa CurtitDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.
Nathalie MeneveauDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.
Olivier AdoteviDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.
Marine JaryDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.
Guillaume EberstINSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, Interactions Hôte-Greffon-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25000, Besançon, France.
Angelique VienotDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.
Fabien CalcagnoDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.
Astrid PozetMethodological and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
Oumelkheir DjoumakhMethodological and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
Christophe BorgDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.
Virginie WesteelMethodological and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
Amélie AnotaMethodological and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
Sophie Paget-BaillyMethodological and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRInstitut de Cancérologie Strasbourg · FR

Funding

Conseil régional de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté APICHU 2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRoutine Electronic Monitoring of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) (REMOQOL) in clinical care with real-time feedback to physicians could help to enhance patient-centered care. We evaluated the feasibility of REMOQOL in the French context in the QOLIBRY study. The primary objective was to assess the patients' compliance with REMOQOL.

methodsThe QOLIBRY study was a single-center, prospective study conducted in the University Hospital of Besançon (France). Eligible patients were those treated with systemic therapies for breast, lung or colorectal cancer at any stage. Patients were invited to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and cancer-site-specific modules before each visit on tablets and/or computers in the hospital or at home. During the consultation, physicians had real-time access to visual summaries of HRQoL scores. Compliance was assessed as adequate if at least 66% of HRQoL assessments were completed during the 4 months of follow-up.

resultsBetween March 2016 and October 2018, 177 patients were included in the QOLIBRY study. Median age was 64 years (IQR 54-71). The proportion of patients with an adequate compliance rate was 95.5% (n = 63) in the breast cancer cohort, 98.2% (n = 55) in the colorectal cancer cohort, and 90.9% (n = 50) in the lung cancer cohort. The physicians checked the HRQoL results in 73.1% of visits and prescribed supportive care and adapted patient management in 8.3% and 5.2% of visits, respectively. CONCLUSION & PERSPECTIVES: The results of QOLIBRY study suggest that REMOQOL is feasible in the French context. However, information about HRQoL monitoring, training of the physicians in the use of the software, and recommendations for using HRQoL results to guide care are essential and must be improved.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsQuality of LifeElectronicsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical practiceElectronic questionnaireHealth-related quality of lifeOncologyPatient-centered carePatient-reported outcome

Identifiers

PMID33387291
OpenAlexW3114455342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.