ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2021
Associations of physiologic myocardial
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can FDG PET Serve as a Clinically Relevant Tool for Detecting Active Non-sarcoidotic Myocarditis?Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- Prediction of cardiac events following concurrent chemoradiation therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer using FDG PET.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2022Article
- Normal values forEJNMMI research · 2022Article
- Various Aspects of Fasting on the Biodistribution of Radiopharmaceuticals.Current drug metabolism · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe variability of physiologic
methodsA total of 446 participants (predominantly male, 91%) in a health screening program were included in this retrospective study. For the visual analysis of myocardial
resultsSignificant differences were observed in fasting duration (p < 0.001), SUV
conclusionsReduced physiologic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.