ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2022
Prediction of reactivity during tracheal intubation by pre-laryngoscopy tetanus-induced ANI variation.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04354311 (Relationship Between the ANI Score During Standardized Painful Stimulation and the Nociceptive Response to Laryngoscopy Intubation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Relationship Between the ANI Score During Standardized Painful Stimulation and the Nociceptive Response to Laryngoscopy Intubation
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Analgesia Nociception Index's Performance During Remimazolam-Based General Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Effect of the Location of Tetanic Stimulation on Autonomic Responses: A Randomized Cross-Over Pilot Study.Journal of pain research · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of analgesia nociception index (ANI) predictability for surgical stimuli under personal analgesic sufficiency status (PASS) measured by pre-tetanus-induced ANI: a pilot study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2023Article
- The validity and applications of the analgesia nociception index: a narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ANI is a nociception monitor based on the high frequency parts of heart rate variability. Tracheal intubation may induce potentially deleterious hemodynamic disturbances or motor reactions if analgesia is inadequate. We investigated whether ANI modification generated by a standardized moderate short tetanic stimulation performed before laryngoscopy could predict hemodynamic or somatic reactions to subsequent intubation. We designed a prospective, interventional, monocentric, pilot study. Regional ethics board approved the study, written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Before laryngoscopy, under steady-state total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil, the ulnar nerve was stimulated with a 5 s tetanus (70 mA, 50 Hz). After another steady-state period, orotracheal intubation was performed. ANI variation, hemodynamic parameters and somatic reactions associated with tetanus and intubation were collected. To assess the predictability of hemodynamic or somatic reaction during laryngoscopy by tetanus-induced ANI variation, we calculated the area under the corresponding Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUCROC) and the 95% confidence intervals. Thirty-five patients were analyzed. ANI decreased by 21 ± 17 after tetanus. Regarding the ability of tetanus-induced ANI variation to predict hemodynamic or somatic reactions during subsequent intubation, the AUCROCs [95% CI] were 0.61 [0.41-0.81] and 0.52 [0.31-0.72] respectively. ANI varied after a short moderate tetanic stimulation performed before laryngoscopy but this variation was not predictive of a hemodynamic or somatic reaction during intubation.Trial registration NCT04354311, April 20th 2020, retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.