Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33387056›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2021

Multicentre, clinical trial of burst spinal cord stimulation for neck and upper limb pain NU-BURST: a trial protocol.

Adnan Al-Kaisy, Girish Vajramani, Sarah Love-Jones, Nikunj K Patel, Jonathan Royds, Stefano Palmisani, David Pang, Samuel Wesley, Hyun-Joo Park, Adil Raza and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03159169 (Treatment of Neck and Upper), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03159169 naterminatednot on this map

Treatment of Neck and Upper (NU) Limb Pain Using BurstDR Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbbott Medical DevicesRan2018 to 2022Enrolled17ConditionsNeck Pain, Upper Limb PainArmsSpinal Cord Stimulation (SCS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Adnan Al-KaisyGuys & St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. alkaisy@aol.com.
Girish VajramaniUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Sarah Love-JonesSouthmead Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Nikunj K PatelSouthmead Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Jonathan RoydsGuys & St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0756-2690
Stefano PalmisaniGuys & St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
David PangGuys & St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Samuel WesleyGuys & St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Hyun-Joo ParkAbbott, Plano, TX, USA.
Adil RazaAbbott, Plano, TX, USA.
Filippo AgnesiAbbott, Plano, TX, USA.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBAbbott (United States) · USSouthmead Hospital · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

St. Jude Medical NU-BURST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established therapy for chronic neuropathic pain and most frequently utilised for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS). BurstDR™ also known as DeRidder Burst-SCS, a novel waveform, has demonstrated superiority to conventional tonic stimulation of the thoracic spine in FBSS. There are case reports of an improvement in multidimensional pain outcomes using DeRidder Burst-SCS in the cervical spine for chronic neck and cervical radicular pain. The safety and efficacy of cervical DeRidder Burst-SCS stimulation still however remain undetermined. METHODS/

designThis is a prospective, multicentre feasibility trial evaluating the safety and therapeutic efficacy of DeRidder Burst-SCS stimulation for the treatment of chronic intractable neck pain with or without radiation to the arm, shoulder, and upper back. After baseline evaluation, subjects will undergo an SCS trial using the Abbott Invisible Trial system according to standard clinical procedures. During the trial phase, SCS leads will be implanted in the cervical epidural space. At the end of the SCS trial, subjects experiencing at least 50% pain relief will be considered for permanent implant. Pain intensity, medication usage, and other multidimensional pain outcomes will be collected. The timing of these will be at baseline, end of the SCS trial and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits. Incidence of adverse events will be collected throughout the study duration. DISCUSSION: The results of this feasibility study will validate the efficacy and safety of DeRidder Burst-SCS stimulation in the cervical spine. The results obtained in this study will potentially be used to generate a level 1 evidence-based study with formal statistical hypotheses testing.

trial registrationwww.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03159169.

Indexed as

Failed Back Surgery SyndromeSpinal Cord StimulationArmClinical Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesSpinal CordTreatment OutcomeBurstChronic painNeck painNervous system diseasesNeuromodulationNeuropathic painSpinal cord stimulationUpper limb pain

Identifiers

PMID33387056
OpenAlexW3117998177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.