Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33387036›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021

Take care or "German Angst"? Lessons from cancer care during COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2020.

Jens Büntzel, Oliver Micke, Michael Klein, Judith Büntzel, Stefanie Walter, Christian Keinki, Jutta Huebner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Assessment of Cancer Patients' Mental Health during the Coronavirus Pandemic in Serbia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jens BüntzelDepartment of Otolaryngology, Südharz Hospital, Dr.-Robert-Koch-Str. 39, 99734, Nordhausen, Germany. jens.buentzel@shk-ndh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7242-5727
Oliver MickeDepartment of Radiooncology, Franziskus Hospital, Bielefeld, Germany.
Michael KleinDepartment of Hematooncology, University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Judith BüntzelDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Göttingen, Germany.
Stefanie WalterFederal Association for Throat Cancer Patients, Bonn, Germany.
Christian KeinkiDepartment of Hematooncology, University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jutta HuebnerDepartment of Hematooncology, University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWhile the second wave of COVID-19 has started in Europe, data are still missing on the consequences of the first one for patients with cancer. The aim of our study was to learn more about the experiences of German patients and staff in the oncology services. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn anonymous online survey was conducted among cancer patients and their therapists (physicians, medical staff, psychologists, spiritual care givers) in Germany between April and May 2020 asking about burden, fears, and perceived changes in German oncology service system. Besides answer frequencies of different stakeholders, uni- and multivariate analyses were performed for selected items to identify areas of high impact.

resultsIn total 752 participants were included. All groups have identified high mental burden as central problem. A majority was confused about varying information policies and strategies against the pandemic. Patient reported restricted visits, isolation and delay of treatment as central fears and problems. The majority of fears could be coped by the health care workers. The patients describe processes at the oncology services during the first wave. Personal experiences with COVID-19 have had no influence on the felt burden of the patients. Physicians, medical staff, psychologists and spiritual care givers were extremely stressed but repressed their own burden. They await financial, physical and mental problems for their own future.

conclusionsThe presented personal views and experiences allow focusing the discussions about heath care systems during the on-going pandemic. Support for health care workers, as much routine as possible in oncology services, and transparency in information will be the keys for good management in futural situations of crisis.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareMental HealthNeeds AssessmentCOVID-19GermanyHealth PersonnelHumansNeoplasmsPatientsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 pandemicHealth care workersMental burdenOncology servicesPatients

Identifiers

PMID33387036
PMCPMC7776312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.