Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33386984›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2021

Is a verification phase needed to determine

Seth F McCarthy, Jarryd M P Leung, Tom J Hazell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seth F McCarthyDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3C5, Canada.
Jarryd M P LeungDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3C5, Canada.
Tom J HazellDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3C5, Canada. thazell@wlu.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8135-4518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent methods (plateau/secondary criteria) to determine maximal oxygen consumption ( PURPOSE: To provide further evidence for the inclusion of a VP to confirm

methodsForty-nine participants (22 females; 21.9 ± 2.6 years, 24.3 ± 2.8 kg m

resultsThe

conclusionThe use of a VP at 105% or a second GXT was able to confirm the

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdultExerciseExercise TestFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleOxygen ConsumptionYoung AdultAerobic performanceCardiorespiratory fitnessExercise testingMaximal oxygen consumptionOxidative metabolism

Identifiers

PMID33386984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.