Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33386981›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Vessel-selective 4D MRA based on ASL might potentially show better performance than 3D TOF MRA for treatment evaluation in patients with intra-extracranial bypass surgery: a prospective study.

Maoxue Wang, Yongbo Yang, Yi Wang, Ming Li, Jilei Zhang, Bing Zhang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A novel model to quantify blood transit time in cerebral arteries using ASL-based 4D magnetic resonance angiography with example clinical application in moyamoya disease.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maoxue WangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, 321 Zhongshan Road, Drum Tower District, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210002, China.
Yongbo YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yi WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Ming LiDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, 321 Zhongshan Road, Drum Tower District, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210002, China.
Jilei ZhangPhilips Healthcare, Shanghai, China.
Bing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, 321 Zhongshan Road, Drum Tower District, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210002, China. zhangbing_nanjing@nju.edu.cn.
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNNanjing Brain Hospital · CNPhilips (China) · CN

Funding

Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81720108022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare bypass patency and intracranial collaterals from the external carotid artery (ECA) by four-dimensional MR angiography (MRA) based on super-selective pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) combined with the keyhole and view-sharing techniques (4D-sPACK) versus three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D TOF) MRA in patients with extra-intracranial revascularization.

methodsThe MR data of 45 patients administered bypass surgery were collected. The image quality of 4D-sPACK was evaluated using a 4-point grading system according to whether the diagnosis of intracranial collaterals was affected. Anastomosis patency and intracranial collateral visualization from ECA were assessed by two radiologists on 4D-sPACK and 3D TOF MRA, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings as reference. Intracranial collateral assessment employed another 4-point grading system according to the number of vessels shown. Interobserver agreement was assessed with the weighted kappa statistic.

resultsFifty hemispheres in 43 patients were included. The image quality of 4D-sPACK was good in 47 (47/50, 94.0%) hemispheres. 4D-sPACK had a higher sensitivity than 3D TOF MRA (97.73% vs 79.55%) for visualizing anastomoses. There were significant differences between 4D-sPACK (scores, 3.22 ± 1.15) and 3D TOF MRA (scores, 1.80 ± 0.67) in the visualization of intracranial collaterals from ECA (p < 0.001). The interobserver agreement was substantial for intracranial collateral assessment (κ

conclusionThis pilot study shows that, 4D-sPACK has a better performance than 3D TOF MRA in treatment evaluation of patients after bypass surgery, and has high consistency with DSA. KEY POINTS: • 4D-sPACK is a non-contrast-enhanced dynamic MRA method for the visualization of intracranial vessels. • 4D-sPACK has higher specificity for the diagnosis of anastomosis occlusion. • 4D-sPACK is better than 3D TOF MRA in the visualization of intracranial collaterals in patients after bypass surgery.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance AngiographyAngiography, Digital SubtractionHumansPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesArterial spin labelingCerebral revascularizationDigital subtraction angiographyMagnetic resonance angiography

Identifiers

PMID33386981
OpenAlexW3117947097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.