Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33386963›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Big data simulations for capacity improvement in a general ophthalmology clinic.

Christoph Kern, André König, Dun Jack Fu, Benedikt Schworm, Armin Wolf, Siegfried Priglinger, Karsten U Kortuem

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A Review of Recent Developments in Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Technologies for Ophthalmology Referrals and Clinical Practice.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Application of big data in ophthalmology.Taiwan journal of ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christoph KernDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Mathildenstraße 8, 80336, Munich, Germany. christoph.kern@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9699-9255
André KönigDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Mathildenstraße 8, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Dun Jack FuMoorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Benedikt SchwormDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Mathildenstraße 8, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Armin WolfDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Siegfried PriglingerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Mathildenstraße 8, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Karsten U KortuemDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Mathildenstraße 8, 80336, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DEMoorfields Eye Hospital · GBUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLong total waiting times (TWT) experienced by patients during a clinic visit have a significant adverse effect on patient's satisfaction. Our aim was to use big data simulations of a patient scheduling calendar and its effect on TWT in a general ophthalmology clinic. Based on the simulation, we implemented changes to the calendar and verified their effect on TWT in clinical practice. DESIGN AND

methodsFor this retrospective simulation study, we generated a discrete event simulation (DES) model based on clinical timepoints of 4.401 visits to our clinic. All data points were exported from our clinical warehouse for further processing. If not available from the electronic health record, manual time measurements of the process were used. Various patient scheduling models were simulated and evaluated based on their reduction of TWT. The most promising model was implemented into clinical practice in 2017.

resultsDuring validation of our simulation model, we achieved a high agreement of mean TWT between the real data (229 ± 100 min) and the corresponding simulated data (225 ± 112 min). This indicates a high quality of the simulation model. Following the simulations, a patient scheduling calendar was introduced, which, compared with the old calendar, provided block intervals and extended time windows for patients. The simulated TWT of this model was 153 min. After implementation in clinical practice, TWT per patient in our general ophthalmology clinic has been reduced from 229 ± 100 to 183 ± 89 min.

conclusionBy implementing a big data simulation model, we have achieved a cost-neutral reduction of the mean TWT by 21%. Big data simulation enables users to evaluate variations to an existing system before implementation into clinical practice. Various models for improving patient flow or reducing capacity loads can be evaluated cost-effectively.

Indexed as

OphthalmologyAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAppointments and SchedulesBig DataHumansRetrospective StudiesBig dataClinic efficiencyDiscrete event simulationOphthalmologyWaiting time optimisation

Identifiers

PMID33386963
PMCPMC8102441
OpenAlexW3116371961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.