Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33386951›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2021

A systematic review of long-duration stents for ureteral stricture: which one to choose?

Mariela Corrales, Steeve Doizi, Yazeed Barghouthy, Hatem Kamkoum, Bhaskar Somani, Olivier Traxer

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Long-term efficacy evaluation of coated metal stent implantation for ureteroscopic lithotripsy related refractory ureteral stricture].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Silicone vs. Polyurethane Stent: The Final Countdown.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariela CorralesGRC Urolithiasis no. 20, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020, Paris, France.
Steeve DoiziGRC Urolithiasis no. 20, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020, Paris, France.
Yazeed BarghouthyGRC Urolithiasis no. 20, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020, Paris, France.
Hatem KamkoumGRC Urolithiasis no. 20, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020, Paris, France.
Bhaskar SomaniUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Olivier TraxerGRC Urolithiasis no. 20, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020, Paris, France. olivier.traxer@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2459-3803
Sorbonne Université · FRUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo define which long-term stent would work best in malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) and benign ureteral obstruction (BUO), focusing on their mechanisms of action, price and insertion approach.

methodsA systematic review was developed using the MEDLINE and Scopus databases and in accordance with the PRISMA checklist. There were no language restrictions for the search. Studies describing the use of metallic ureteric stents for MUO and for BUO in humans were included.

resultsWe analyzed five types of metallic stents (35 papers) and also the experience with the tumor and extra-anatomical stents. The Resonance, Memokath and Allium ureteral stents were found to be useful in BUO and MUO. The Uventa stent performed well in chronic ureteral obstruction. The Detour bypass stent was a recommended option in those patients who had complete obstruction of the ureter and were unfit for reconstructive surgery. There was no difference with regard to the insertion technique and both antegrade and retrograde approaches were equally successful. Although tumor stents showed a good performance, there were very few published studies on it.

conclusionMetallic stents are a suitable option for MUO and BUO. When compared to standard double J stents, although they are relatively high priced, they show a financial benefit in the long-term. The Detour bypass stent seems to be an effective alternative for complete ureteral obstruction or patients unfit for surgery. Further prospective randomized studies should be done on the effectiveness of tumor stents versus metallic stents.

Indexed as

StentsConstriction, PathologicHumansProsthesis DesignTime FactorsUreteral ObstructionBenign stricture and malignant strictureMalignancyMetallic stentsStentTumor stentsUreteral obstruction

Identifiers

PMID33386951
OpenAlexW3113716734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.