Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33386848›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Variation in Pleiotropic Hub Gene Expression Is Associated with Interspecific Differences in Head Shape and Eye Size in Drosophila.

Elisa Buchberger, Anıl Bilen, Sanem Ayaz, David Salamanca, Cristina Matas de Las Heras, Armin Niksic, Isabel Almudi, Montserrat Torres-Oliva, Fernando Casares, Nico Posnien

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Molecular Properties and Roles ofFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Behavior Individuality: A Focus onFrontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisa BuchbergerDepartment of Developmental Biology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Anıl BilenDepartment of Developmental Biology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Sanem AyazDepartment of Developmental Biology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
David SalamancaDepartment of Developmental Biology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Cristina Matas de Las HerasDepartment of Developmental Biology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Armin NiksicDepartment of Developmental Biology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Isabel AlmudiCABD (CSIC/UPO/JA), DMC2 Unit, Pablo de Olavide University Campus, Seville, Spain.
Montserrat Torres-OlivaDepartment of Developmental Biology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Fernando CasaresCABD (CSIC/UPO/JA), DMC2 Unit, Pablo de Olavide University Campus, Seville, Spain.
Nico PosnienDepartment of Developmental Biology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0700-5595
University of Göttingen · DEUniversidad Pablo de Olavide · ES

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Revealing the mechanisms underlying the breathtaking morphological diversity observed in nature is a major challenge in Biology. It has been established that recurrent mutations in hotspot genes cause the repeated evolution of morphological traits, such as body pigmentation or the gain and loss of structures. To date, however, it remains elusive whether hotspot genes contribute to natural variation in the size and shape of organs. As natural variation in head morphology is pervasive in Drosophila, we studied the molecular and developmental basis of differences in compound eye size and head shape in two closely related Drosophila species. We show differences in the progression of retinal differentiation between species and we applied comparative transcriptomics and chromatin accessibility data to identify the GATA transcription factor Pannier (Pnr) as central factor associated with these differences. Although the genetic manipulation of Pnr affected multiple aspects of dorsal head development, the effect of natural variation is restricted to a subset of the phenotypic space. We present data suggesting that this developmental constraint is caused by the coevolution of expression of pnr and its cofactor u-shaped (ush). We propose that natural variation in expression or function of highly connected developmental regulators with pleiotropic functions is a major driver for morphological evolution and we discuss implications on gene regulatory network evolution. In comparison to previous findings, our data strongly suggest that evolutionary hotspots are not the only contributors to the repeated evolution of eye size and head shape in Drosophila.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetic PleiotropyAnimalsCompound Eye, ArthropodDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksHeadLarvaMaleSpecies SpecificityTranscription FactorsTranscriptomeDrosophila Proteinspnr protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factorsush protein, DrosophilaDrosophilaevolutionary hotspotsevolution of developmenteye–antennal discgene regulatory networksrepeated evolution

Identifiers

PMID33386848
PMCPMC8097299
OpenAlexW3113748718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.