Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33386638›Full record

ArticleMedical education2021

'I found myself a despicable being!': Medical students face disturbing moral dilemmas.

Diego Lima Ribeiro, Marcos Costa, Esther Helmich, Debbie Jaarsma, Marco Antonio de Carvalho-Filho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Promoting professional judgement through peer debate in radiation therapy undergraduate curriculum.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Exploring Professionalism Dilemma and Moral Distress through Medical Students' Eyes: A Mixed-Method Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Moral Judgement along the Academic Training.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diego Lima RibeiroDepartment of Ethics and Emergency Medicine, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0731-9308
Marcos CostaUniversity Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1544-0116
Esther HelmichCenter for Education Development and Research in Health Professions, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9197-844X
Debbie JaarsmaCenter for Education Development and Research in Health Professions, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1668-2002
Marco Antonio de Carvalho-FilhoCenter for Education Development and Research in Health Professions, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7008-4092

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe psychological realm of medical students' moral experiences is explored tangentially in medical education literature, often in the context of ethics or professionalism education. This study deepens our understanding by (a) investigating the nature of moral dilemmas experienced at the onset of clinical practice, (b) exploring students' emotional response to these dilemmas, and (c) examining how students perceive the influence of these dilemmas on their professional development.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional qualitative study carried out in 2017 that applied thematic template analysis to individual interviews performed with last-year medical students. The interviews followed the drawing of a Rich Picture representing moral dilemmas experienced by medical students at the onset of clinical practice.

resultsMoral dilemmas have four intertwined dimensions. The first relates to students' struggle to prioritise, balance and apply conflicting moral values; the second comprises the clash between students' inner motivation and the external constraints that limit the moral action; the third refers to the conflict between students' current attitudes with the desired/idealised attitudes of the doctor they intend to become; and the fourth corresponds to weighting conflicting ethical principles during the moral decision. Students' emotional responses are intense and long-lasting, and with a remarkable residue effect, particularly when the moral decision does not align with their moral beliefs. Moral dilemmas are impactful experiences that affect the professional development of medical students and can culminate in both detachment and growth in moral courage.

conclusionMoral dilemmas are memorable, complex and emotionally intense experiences that impact the professional development of medical students. Understanding students' moral dilemmas can help educators to devise pedagogical activities to anticipate and reflect on these experiences. These activities should happen under the guidance of a non-judgemental facilitator, capable of listening and legitimating students' thoughts and feelings while providing insights to nurture their professional development.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalStudents, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMoralsProfessionalism

Identifiers

PMID33386638
PMCPMC8248051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.