Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33386602›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2021

Clinical outcomes of drug-eluting balloon for treatment of small coronary artery in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Qiang Tan, Qingsheng Wang, Hongmei Yang, Zhang Jing, Chen Ming

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Intrastent Restenosis: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiang TanDepartment of Cardiology, Qinhuangdao First Hospital, Hebei Medical University, No. 258 of Wenhua Road, Qinhuangdao, 066000, Hebei Province, China. qhdtanqiang@aliyun.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1621-4428
Qingsheng WangDepartment of Cardiology, Qinhuangdao First Hospital, Hebei Medical University, No. 258 of Wenhua Road, Qinhuangdao, 066000, Hebei Province, China.
Hongmei YangDepartment of Cardiology, Qinhuangdao First Hospital, Hebei Medical University, No. 258 of Wenhua Road, Qinhuangdao, 066000, Hebei Province, China.
Zhang JingDepartment of Cardiology, Qinhuangdao First Hospital, Hebei Medical University, No. 258 of Wenhua Road, Qinhuangdao, 066000, Hebei Province, China.
Chen MingDepartment of Cardiology, Qinhuangdao First Hospital, Hebei Medical University, No. 258 of Wenhua Road, Qinhuangdao, 066000, Hebei Province, China.
Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

Hebei medical technology project (20171252)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There were good clinical outcomes of drug-eluting balloon (DEB) use in de novo lesions and in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions. However, few studies focused on DEB use in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of this study was to retrospective evaluate the efficacy of DEB for patients of AMI with de novo small coronary artery disease. Between March 2016 and March 2018, patients of AMI with de novo small coronary artery (reference diameter 2.0-2.8 mm) and received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled. 268 patients were divided into DEB group (PCI with further DEB, n = 56) and drug-eluting stent (DES) group (PCI with further DES, n = 212). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE; all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization) at 24 months. A subset of patients underwent angiographic follow-up. Clinical characteristics were balanced in the two groups. Mean reference vessel diameter was similar between the DEB and DES groups (2.64 ± 0.17 mm vs 2.65 ± 0.14 mm, P = 0.625). The 24-month MACE rates were 17.5% in DEB group and 16.4% in DES group (P = 0.853). Stent thrombosis was seen in three patients (1.46%) in DES group. There was no vessel thrombosis noted in the DEB group. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 35.71% of DEB group and 27.25% of DES group. Late lumen loss was similar between the two groups (DEB 0.14 ± 0.13 mm, DES 0.19 ± 0.12 mm, P = 0.442). DEB is a reasonable strategy for AMI with small coronary artery. Compared with DES, DEB is an alternative strategy which had similar 24-month clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryDrug-Eluting StentsAgedCombined Modality TherapyCoronary StenosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRetrospective StudiesDrug-eluting balloonDrug-eluting stentPercutaneous coronary interventionSmall coronary artery disease

Identifiers

PMID33386602
OpenAlexW3116759793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.