ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2021
Modeling the mechanics of fibrous-porous scaffolds for skeletal muscle regeneration.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced materials and devices strategies of mechanical stimulation for tissue regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Computational Analysis and Optimization of Geometric Parameters for Fibrous Scaffold Design.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Systems for Muscle Cell Differentiation: From Bioengineering to Future Food.Micromachines · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The scaffolds for skeletal muscle regeneration are designed to mimic the structure, stiffness, and strains applied to the muscle under physiologic conditions. The external strains are also used to stimulate myogenesis of the (stem) cells seeded on the scaffold. The time- and location-dependent mechanics inside the scaffold determine the microenvironment for the seeded cells. Here, fibrous-porous cylindrical scaffolds under the action of external cyclic strains are considered. The scaffold mechanics are described as two-phase (poroelastic) where the solid phase is associated with the fibers and the fluid phase is associated with the liquid-containing pores. In response to an applied cyclic strain, pressure oscillates and fluid moves radially toward and away from the axis of the scaffold. We compute the directions and magnitudes of the radial gradients of the poroelastic characteristics (solid-phase displacement, strain, and velocity; fluid-phase pressure and velocity; relative fluid-solid-phase velocity) determined by the boundary conditions and geometry of the scaffold. Several kinds of the external cyclic strain are analyzed and the resulting poroelastic functions are found. The poroelastic characteristics are obtained in closed form which is convenient for further consideration of myogenesis of the seeded cells and ultimately for the design of the scaffolds for skeletal muscle regeneration. Graphical abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.