Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33386520›Full record

Observational studyDigestive diseases and sciences2021

Rehospitalization, Treatment, and Resource Use After Inpatient Admission for Achalasia in the USA.

Kamesh Gupta, Ahmad Khan, Jean Chalhoub, Kevin Groudan, David Desilets

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kamesh GuptaDepartment of Internal Medicine, UMMS-Baystate Medical Center, 759, Chestnut St, Springfield, MA, 01199, USA. Kameshg9@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1033-0404
Ahmad KhanDepartment of Medicine, West Virginia University- Charleston Division, Charleston, WV, USA.
Jean ChalhoubDepartment of Gastroenterology, UMMS-Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA.
Kevin GroudanDepartment of Internal Medicine, UMMS-Baystate Medical Center, 759, Chestnut St, Springfield, MA, 01199, USA.
David DesiletsDepartment of Gastroenterology, UMMS-Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReadmission for achalasia treatment is associated with significant morbidity and cost. Factors predictive of readmission would be useful in identifying patients at risk.

methodsWe performed a retrospective study using the Nationwide Readmission Database for the year 2016 and 2017. We collected data on hospital readmissions of 17,848 adults who were hospitalized for achalasia and discharged. The 30-day readmission rate as well as the primary cause, mortality rate, in-hospital adverse events, and total hospitalization charges were examined. A cox multivariate regression model was used to identify independent risk factors for 30-day readmission, including the surgical or endoscopic treatment used during the index admission.

resultsFrom 2016 to 2017, the 30-day readmission rate for index admission with achalasia was 15.2%. Of these 15.2%, 34% were readmitted with persistent symptoms of achalasia or treatment-related complications. Older age, higher comorbidity index, possessing private insurance, and those with either pneumatic balloon dilation or no endoscopic/surgical treatment showed higher odds of readmission on multivariate analysis. Those treated with laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) or peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) showed lower odds of readmission. There was no difference in rates of readmission between those undergoing POEM or LHM, but mortality rate for readmission was significantly higher for the LHM group. The in-hospital mortality rate and length of stay were significantly higher for readmissions (p < 0.01) than the index admissions.

conclusionThree in 20 patients admitted with achalasia are likely to be readmitted within 30 days of their initial hospitalization, a number which can be higher in untreated patients and in those with multiple comorbidities. Rehospitalizations bear a higher mortality rate than the initial admission and present a burden to the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Health ResourcesHeller MyotomyInpatientsPatient ReadmissionPyloromyotomyAgedDatabases, FactualEsophageal AchalasiaFemaleHospital ChargesHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies30-Day readmissionAchalasiaEpidemiologyNRDOutcomes researchPOEM versus LHM

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.