Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33386465›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue banking2021

Making a family decision to donate the brain for genomic research: lessons from the genotype-tissue expression project (GTEx).

Laura A Siminoff, Deborah Mash, Maureen Wilson-Genderson, Heather M Gardiner, Maghboeba Mosavel, Laura Barker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura A SiminoffCollege of Public Health, Temple University, 1700 N. Broad Street Suite 202 - 2nd Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA. lasiminoff@temple.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-665X
Deborah MashNeurology and Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, USA.
Maureen Wilson-GendersonCollege of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.
Heather M GardinerDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.
Maghboeba MosavelDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
Laura BarkerCollege of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sheds light on the attitudes and circumstances that influence decisions by families to donate the brain of a deceased family member for research. This study, a part of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project, interviewed families of patients who had authorized organ and/or tissue donation for transplantation. A total of 384 family decision makers (FDMs) who decided to donate organs and/or tissues for transplantation were also asked to donate to GTEx. Of these, 297 families were asked to donate their loved one's whole brain and 87 families responded to a hypothetical request for brain donation. The decision to donate the brain to GTEx, actually or hypothetically, was the major outcome measure. The majority of the FDMs would choose to donate the brain, 78%. Unwillingness to donate the brain was associated with four attitudes: (1) the FDM unwillingness to donate their own tissues for research (OR 1.91, 95% CI .67 to 2.96; p = .05), (2) concern with potential for-profit use of tissues (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.7; p = .008), (3) reported squeamishness about tissue donation (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.7; p = .006), and (4) belief that FDMs should have a say in how the donated tissues are used (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.5; p = .01). Organ and tissue donors may present a plenteous source of brains for research. Family concerns about tissue use and collection should be addressed by requesters.

Indexed as

FamilyTissue and Organ ProcurementBrainDecision MakingGenomicsGenotypeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansTissue DonorsBiobankingBrain donationGenomic researchSurrogate decision makingTissue donation

Identifiers

PMID33386465
PMCPMC9040537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.