Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33386456›Full record

Observational studySurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2021

Trochlear cistern of the cavernous sinus: an anatomical study using magnetic resonance imaging.

Satoshi Tsutsumi, Hideo Ono, Hisato Ishii

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Satoshi TsutsumiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, Chiba, 279-0021, Japan. shotaro@juntendo-urayasu.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4651-3018
Hideo OnoDivision of Radiological Technology, Medical Satellite Yaesu Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Hisato IshiiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, Chiba, 279-0021, Japan.
Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study aimed to explore the trochlear cistern (TC) of the cavernous sinus using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

methodsFollowing conventional MRI examination, a total of 73 patients underwent the constructive interference steady-state (CISS) sequence in thin-sliced coronal sections. Moreover, three injected cadaver heads were dissected.

resultsIn the cadaver specimens, the extent of the TC was difficult to identify on any dissected side. On the CISS images, the TC was identified in 98.6% on the right side and 94.5% on the left, while transmitting the trochlear nerve (TN) was identified in 83.6% on the right and 79.5% on the left. Most TNs were delineated as a single trunk, while duplication of the nerve was found in 3% of cases. The TC, commonly located inferior or inferolateral aspect of the oculomotor trigone. The size and extent of TC were highly variable. The TN location in the TC was also variable and was identified throughout the upper, middle, and lower parts of the TC. Moreover, relationships between the TC and Meckel's cave were highly variable.

conclusionsTC shows morphological variability. The coronal CISS sequence is useful for exploring TC and TN in clinical practices.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCadaverCavernous SinusChildFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedTrochlear NerveYoung AdultCavernous sinusCISS sequenceMagnetic resonance imagingTrochlear cistern

Identifiers

PMID33386456
OpenAlexW3115404948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.