Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33386438›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Adherence to intensive nutrition care in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Sheilla de Oliveira Faria, Doris Howell, André Lopes Carvalho, Rafael de Oliveira Faria, José Eluf Neto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheilla de Oliveira FariaDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr Arnaldo, 455 2ºandar, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-903, Brazil. sheila.faria@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6426-932X
Doris HowellPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
André Lopes CarvalhoHead and Neck Surgery, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Rafael de Oliveira FariaDepartamento de Engenharia Agrícola, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil.
José Eluf NetoDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr Arnaldo, 455 2ºandar, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-903, Brazil.
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos · BROntario Institute for Cancer Research · CAUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Lavras · BRUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and effect of adherence to intensive nutritional care on nutritional outcomes and survival in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

methodsThree-hundred and seventeen head and neck cancer patients referred to intensive nutrition support during radiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who missed less than 25% of their appointments with the dietitian were considered adherent. Primary outcome was percentage weight loss during treatment. Secondary outcomes were overall survival and patients' capacity to accomplish their caloric and protein recommendations. Logistic regression was used to examine predictors of weight loss and Kaplan-Meier to estimate survival.

resultsLess than half of the patients (n = 145, 45.7%) were adherent. Statistically significant less weight loss in the adherent group (42.8% vs 55.8%; p = 0.02) was found, despite no difference in energy or protein intake. Logistic regression models after adjusting for other variables demonstrated that adherence resulted in 43% protection from significant weight loss (odds ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.97). Overall survival was not different between groups.

conclusionFindings demonstrated that patients who were adherent to weekly contacts with the dietitian had less weight loss, but not better survival or nutritional intake. Additional investigation of factors that may act as barriers or enablers for adherence could help improve the outcomes in this population.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsNutritional StatusHumansNutritional SupportRetrospective StudiesWeight LossAdherenceComplianceDietHead and neck cancerNutritionOral cancer

Identifiers

PMID33386438
OpenAlexW3115149921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.