Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33386092›Full record

ArticleDrug discovery today. Technologies2019

The good, the bad, and the ugly in chemical and biological data for machine learning.

Tiago Rodrigues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug discovery today. Technologies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Problems that Can Occur when Assaying Extracts to Pure Compounds in Biological Systems.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tiago RodriguesInstituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Av Prof Egaz Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal; Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto 1649-003, Lisboa, Portugal. Electronic address: tiago.rodrigues@ff.ulisboa.pt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning and artificial intelligence (ML/AI) have become important research tools in molecular medicine and chemistry. Their rise and recent success in drug discovery promises a rapid progression of development pipelines while reshaping how fundamental and clinical research is conducted. By taking advantage of the ever-growing wealth of publicly available and proprietary data, learning algorithms now provide an attractive means to generate statistically motivated research hypotheses. Hitherto unknown data patterns may guide and prioritize experiments, and augment expert intuition. Therefore, data is a key component in the model building workflow. Herein, I aim to discuss types of chemical and biological data according to their quality and reemphasize general recommendations for their use in ML/AI.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDrug DiscoveryMachine LearningHumans

Identifiers

PMID33386092
PMCPMC7382642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.