Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33385950›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2021

Augmentation of core decompression with synthetic bone graft does not improve mechanical properties of the proximal femur.

Samuel A Hockett, John T Sherrill, Micah Self, Simon C Mears, C Lowry Barnes, Erin M Mannen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel A HockettDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA; Department of Engineering and Physics, Harding University, Searcy, AR, USA.
John T SherrillDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Micah SelfDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Simon C MearsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
C Lowry BarnesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Erin M MannenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA; Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering Department, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA. Electronic address: erinmannen@boisestate.edu.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USBoise State University · USHarding University Main Campus · US

Funding

Understanding the Negative Prognostic Impact of Intraosseous Focal Lesions in Multiple MyelomaP20GM125503 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Sanja Novak · 2018 to 2026
$23.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM125503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Core decompression is a minimally invasive surgical technique used to treat patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head. The procedure requires an entry hole in the lateral cortex of the femur which potentially leaves patients susceptible to subtrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine if filling the core decompression tract with synthetic bone-graft mechanically strengthens the proximal femur. Twenty composite synthetic femurs underwent a core decompression procedure; ten were augmented with synthetic bone-graft (PRO-DENSE™, Wright Medical) and ten femurs were left unfilled as a control group. Compressive testing to failure was performed using a mechanical testing machine. Stiffness, fracture load, and toughness did not significantly differ between groups. More subtrochanteric fractures were seen in the control group (6 of 10 specimens) compared to the bone-graft augmented group (2 of 10 specimens). In conclusion, augmentation of a core decompression tract does not improve mechanical properties in a synthetic bone model but may be protective of subtrochanteric fracture.

Indexed as

Decompression, SurgicalFemurBone TransplantationFemur HeadHumansAvascular necrosisBone augmentationCore decompressionHip fracture

Identifiers

PMID33385950
PMCPMC9487541
OpenAlexW3110945823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.