Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33385301›Full record

ArticleNursing open2021

Improving management of psoriasis patients receiving biological treatment: A qualitative approach.

Bettina Trettin, Steven Feldman, Flemming Andersen, Dorthe B Danbjørg, Hanne Agerskov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bettina TrettinDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3851-7294
Steven FeldmanWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0090-6289
Flemming AndersenDepartment of Clinical Research, Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1199-9396
Dorthe B DanbjørgDepartment of Clinical Research, Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9188-403X
Hanne AgerskovDepartment of Clinical Research, Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3271-0686

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate psoriasis patients' and healthcare professionals' experiences and perspectives of follow-up consultations.

designA qualitative study with a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach.

methodParticipant observations of consultations and semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients receiving biological treatment, together with two focus groups with healthcare professionals, from June 2018-January 2019. Data were analysed using a qualitative structured approach based on Paul Ricoeur's philosophy of interpretation.

resultsConsultations had a strong biomedical and corrective approach focusing on lifestyle behaviour change, measurements and permanent routines. Healthcare professionals felt the need for enhanced competencies providing lifestyle behaviour change support and the possibility of providing patients more specific strategies. They were faced with a dilemma between lacking the right skills and having a professional duty. The frequent follow-up visits did not fit in with the patients' everyday lives.

Indexed as

PsoriasisFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHermeneuticsHumansQualitative Researchbiological treatmentparticipatory designpsoriasisqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33385301
PMCPMC8046082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.