ArticleWorld journal of urology2021
Implementing telemedicine for the management of benign urologic conditions: a single centre experience in Italy.
Article in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Implementations and strategies of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2022Pooled it
- Telehealth utilization during the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Metaverse in surgery - origins and future potential.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Telemedicine-Based Virtual Stone Clinics for Renal Colic: Cost-Benefit Insights and Adoption Barriers.Cureus · 2025Review
- Enhancing postoperative functional recovery: Impact of the MAIA™ telerehabilitation platform in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.Asian journal of urology · 2025Article
- Telemedicine in Endourology for Patient Management and Healthcare Delivery: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Current urology reports · 2024Review
- The Impact on Urology Residents' Learning of Social Media and Web Technologies after the Pandemic: A Step Forward through the Sharing of Knowledge.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Telemedicine in the COVID-19 Era: A Narrative Review Based on Current Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Functional Urology Practice: A Nationwide Survey From Turkey.Medeniyet medical journal · 2022Article
- A Narrative Review of the Launch and the Deployment of Telemedicine in Italy during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Telemedicine and Telehealth in Urology: Uptake, Impact and Barriers to Clinical Adoption.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Innovative Tele-Instruction Approach Impacts Basic Life Support Performance: A Non-inferiority Trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Telemedicine use in current urologic oncology clinical practice.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Performing Sensitive Clinical Examinations During Urological Telemedicine Visits: How to Avoid Pitfalls?Research and reports in urology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the use of telemedicine with phone-call visits as a practical tool to follow-up with patients affected by urological benign diseases, whose clinic visits had been cancelled during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsPatients were contacted via phone-call and a specific questionnaire was administered to evaluate the health status of these patients and to identify those who needed an "in-person" ambulatory visit due to the worsening of their condition. Secondarily, the patients' perception of a potential shift towards a "telemedicine" approach to the management of their condition and to indirectly evaluate their desire to return to "in-person" clinic visits.
results607 were contacted by phone-call. 87.5% (531/607) of the cases showed stability of the symptoms so no clinic in-person or emergency visits were needed. 81.5% (495/607) of patients were more concerned about the risk of contagion than their urological condition. The median score for phone visit comprehensibility and ease of communication of exams was 5/5; whilst patients' perception of phone visits' usefulness was scored 4/5. 53% (322/607) of the interviewees didn't own the basic supports required to be able to perform a real telemedicine consult according to the required standards.
conclusionTelemedicine approach limits the number of unnecessary accesses to medical facilities and represents an important tool for the limitation of the risk of transmission of infectious diseases, such as COVID-19. However, infrastructures, health workers and patients should reach out to a computerization process to allow a wider diffusion of more advanced forms of telemedicine, such as televisit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.