Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33385204›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses2021

What Matters to Patients and Their Families During and After Critical Illness: A Qualitative Study.

Catherine L Auriemma, Michael O Harhay, Kimberley J Haines, Frances K Barg, Scott D Halpern, Sarah M Lyon

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hospital-free days: A novel measure to study outcomes for emergency department care.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catherine L AuriemmaCatherine L. Auriemma is a pulmonary and critical care fellow, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine; Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center; and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Michael O HarhayMichael O. Harhay is a biostatistician, PAIR Center; and Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Kimberley J HainesKimberley J. Haines is an intensive care unit physiotherapist, Department of Physiotherapy, Western Health; Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne; and Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Frances K BargFrances K. Barg is a medical anthropologist, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; and Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania School of Arts and Sciences, Philadelphia.
Scott D HalpernScott D. Halpern is a pulmonary and critical care physician, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine; PAIR Center; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, and Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Sarah M LyonSarah M. Lyon is a pulmonary and critical care physician, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; and Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Training in Critical Care Health Policy ResearchT32HL098054 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Scott D Halpern · 2010 to 2026
$8.2M
Improving the fairness of RCTs among patients with acute and chronic respiratory failureK24HL143289 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Scott D Halpern · 2018 to 2026
$1.1M
Improving the measurement and analysis of long-term, patient-centered outcomes following acute respiratory failureR00HL141678 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HARHAY, MICHAEL OSCAR · 2020 to 2022
$747k
Improving the measurement and analysis of long-term, patient-centered outcomes following acute respiratory failureK99HL141678 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HARHAY, MICHAEL OSCAR · 2018 to 2019
$214k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL143289NHLBI NIH HHS K99 HL141678NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL141678NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increased emphasis on providing higher-quality patient- and family-centered care in the intensive care unit (ICU), there are no widely accepted definitions of such care in the ICU.

objectivesTo determine (1) aspects of care that patients and families valued during their ICU encounter, (2) outcomes that patients and families prioritized after hospital discharge, and (3) outcomes perceived as equivalent to or worse than death.

methodsSemistructured interviews (n = 49) of former patients of an urban, academic medical ICU and their family members. Two investigators reviewed all transcripts line by line to identify key concepts. Codes were created and defined in a codebook with decision rules for their application and were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsSalient themes were identified and grouped into 2 major categories: (1) processes of care within the ICU- communication, patient comfort, and a sense that the medical team was "doing everything" (ie, providing exhaustive medical care) and (2) patient and surrogate outcomes after the ICU-survival, quality of life, physical function, and cognitive function. Several outcomes were deemed worse than death: severe cognitive/physical disability, dependence on medical machinery/equipment, and severe/constant pain.

conclusionAlthough survival was important, most participants qualified this preference. Simple measures of mortality rates may not represent patient- or family-centered outcomes in evaluations of ICU-based interventions, and new measures that incorporate functional outcomes and patients' and family members' views of life quality are necessary to promote patient-centered, evidence-based care.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareAdultAgedFamilyFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID33385204
PMCPMC8101225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.