Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33384910›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Psychosocial variables and quality of life during the COVID-19 lockdown: a correlational study on a convenience sample of young Italians.

Anna Lardone, Pierpaolo Sorrentino, Francesco Giancamilli, Tommaso Palombi, Trevor Simper, Laura Mandolesi, Fabio Lucidi, Andrea Chirico, Federica Galli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. COVID-19 Pandemic: 1-Year Follow-Up in Children and Adolescents with Neuropsychiatric Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna Lardone *Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Roma "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Pierpaolo Sorrentino *Institut de Neuroscience des Systemès, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9556-9800
Francesco GiancamilliDepartment of Social and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Roma "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2874-9182
Tommaso PalombiDepartment of Social and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Roma "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Trevor SimperSchool of Sports Science, Exercise & Health., University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Laura MandolesiDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3685-7554
Fabio LucidiDepartment of Social and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Roma "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2203-9566
Andrea ChiricoDepartment of Social and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Roma "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Federica GalliDepartment of Social and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Roma "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4729-1031

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2020, to limit the spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19), many countries, including Italy, have issued a lengthy quarantine period for the entire population. For this reason lifestyle has changed, bringing inevitable repercussions to the Quality of Life (QoL). The present study aims to identify which psychosocial variables predict behaviors capable of affecting the QoL during the lockdown period, potentially highlighting factors that might promote well-being and health in the Italian population during the epidemic.

methodsBetween 27 April 2020 and 11 May 2020, we administered a web-survey to a sample of young Italian people (age

resultsOur results suggest that social connectedness and loneliness are significant predictors of QoL, while social support did not have a significant effect on QoL. Furthermore, we observed that symbolic and realistic threats and the threat from potentially contaminated objects are significant and positive predictors of COVID-19 fear. Moreover, COVID-19 fear had significant and positive relationships with the carrying out of specific behaviors, such as creative activities during the isolation period and that this related to affirming individuals' country-specific identity. Finally, COVID-19 fear is a significant predictor of behavioral factors related to the adherence to public health advice in line with national guidance regarding the containment of COVID-19; this factor, however, did not correlate with QoL.

conclusionOur results suggest the importance of social context and psychological factors to help devise intervention strategies to improve the QoL during lockdown from epidemic events and, in particular, support the importance of promoting social communication and accurate information about the transmission of the virus.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19 web-surveyEpidemicFear for COVID-19LockdownPandemicQuality of lifeQuarantineVariance-based structural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID33384910
PMCPMC7751426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.