Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33384885›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020

Oculomotor Responses to Dynamic Stimuli in a 44-Channel Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis.

Samuel A Titchener, Jessica Kvansakul, Mohit N Shivdasani, James B Fallon, D A X Nayagam, Stephanie B Epp, Chris E Williams, Nick Barnes, William G Kentler, Maria Kolic and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Motion perception with visual prostheses.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Eye Tracking in Optometry: A Systematic Review.Journal of eye movement research · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel A TitchenerBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Australia.
Jessica KvansakulBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Australia.
Mohit N ShivdasaniGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.
James B FallonBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Australia.
D A X NayagamBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Australia.
Stephanie B EppBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Australia.
Chris E WilliamsBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Australia.
Nick BarnesData61, CSIRO, Canberra, Australia.
William G KentlerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Maria KolicCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Elizabeth K BaglinCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Lauren N AytonCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Carla J AbbottCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Chi D LuuCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Penelope J AllenCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Matthew A PetoeBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUBionics Institute · AUCentre for Eye Research Australia · AUData61 · AUSt Vincent's Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate oculomotor behavior in response to dynamic stimuli in retinal implant recipients. Methods: Three suprachoroidal retinal implant recipients performed a four-alternative forced-choice motion discrimination task over six sessions longitudinally. Stimuli were a single white bar ("moving bar") or a series of white bars ("moving grating") sweeping left, right, up, or down across a 42″ monitor. Performance was compared with normal video processing and scrambled video processing (randomized image-to-electrode mapping to disrupt spatiotemporal structure). Eye and head movement was monitored throughout the task. Results: Two subjects had diminished performance with scrambling, suggesting retinotopic discrimination was used in the normal condition and made smooth pursuit eye movements congruent to the moving bar stimulus direction. These two subjects also made stimulus-related eye movements resembling optokinetic reflex (OKR) for moving grating stimuli, but the movement was incongruent with stimulus direction. The third subject was less adept at the task, appeared primarily reliant on head position cues (head movements were congruent to stimulus direction), and did not exhibit retinotopic discrimination and associated eye movements. Conclusions: Our observation of smooth pursuit indicates residual functionality of cortical direction-selective circuits and implies a more naturalistic perception of motion than expected. A distorted OKR implies improper functionality of retinal direction-selective circuits, possibly due to retinal remodeling or the non-selective nature of the electrical stimulation. Translational Relevance: Retinal implant users can make naturalistic eye movements in response to moving stimuli, highlighting the potential for eye tracker feedback to improve perceptual localization and image stabilization in camera-based visual prostheses.

Indexed as

Visual ProsthesisEye MovementsHead MovementsHumansPhotic StimulationPursuit, Smootheye movementshead movementsmotion perceptionretinal prosthesisvisual prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID33384885
PMCPMC7757638
OpenAlexW3116296727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.