Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33384800›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental sciences2021

Comparison of the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument and JMS tongue pressure measurement device.

Mineka Yoshikawa, Tatsuyuki Fukuoka, Takahiro Mori, Aya Hiraoka, Chiaki Higa, Azusa Kuroki, Chiho Takeda, Mariko Maruyama, Mitsuyoshi Yoshida, Kazuhiro Tsuga

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07080996 (Effect of Biofeedback Tongue Strengthening Program on Tongue Pressure and Swallowing Performance in Elderly With Abnormal Tongue Pressure), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07080996 phase3enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Biofeedback Tongue Strengthening Program on Tongue Pressure and Swallowing Performance in Elderly With Abnormal Tongue Pressure

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled52ConditionsPresbyphagia, Abnormal Tongue PressureArmsStrengthening training with biofeedback, Endurance training with biofeedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mineka YoshikawaDepartment of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan.
Tatsuyuki FukuokaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Hiroshima International University, Japan.
Takahiro MoriDepartment of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan.
Aya HiraokaDepartment of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan.
Chiaki HigaDepartment of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan.
Azusa KurokiDepartment of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan.
Chiho TakedaDepartment of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan.
Mariko MaruyamaDepartment of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan.
Mitsuyoshi YoshidaDepartment of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan.
Kazuhiro TsugaDepartment of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/purposeTongue pressure measurement conveys important information about eating and swallowing function. The Iowa Oral Performance Instrument® (IOPI) and KAY Swallowing Workstation® are internationally used for tongue pressure measurement, but for legal reasons cannot be used in Japan; rather the JMS tongue pressure measurement device® has been approved for use in Japan. However, it is not clear whether measurement obtained with these devices are directly comparable. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study investigated the correlation between the maximum tongue pressure data measured by the IOPI and the JMS tongue pressure measurement device in young healthy participants (34 males; 23.2 ± 2.0 years old, and 40 females; 21.4 ± 1.3 years old).

resultsMeasurements obtained with these two devices showed significant correlations in the total cohort, and in male and female participants, separately (P < 0.05).

conclusionThese findings demonstrate that the measurements obtained with the JMS device is comparable to those obtained with the IOPI. In Japan, JMS tongue pressure measurement device is used not only in dysphagia research field, but also geriatrics field, and extensive and detailed investigations has been carried out.

Indexed as

DeglutitionDysphagiaOral examination oral functionTongueTongue pressure

Identifiers

PMID33384800
PMCPMC7770307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.