Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33384629›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020

Ensemble Learning of Convolutional Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, and Best Linear Unbiased Predictor for Brain Age Prediction: ARAMIS Contribution to the Predictive Analytics Competition 2019 Challenge.

Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne, Johann Faouzi, Benoît Martin, Elina Thibeau-Sutre, Adam Wild, Manon Ansart, Stanley Durrleman, Didier Dormont, Ninon Burgos, Olivier Colliot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Anatomically interpretable deep learning of brain age captures domain-specific cognitive impairment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Baptiste Couvy-DuchesneParis Brain Institute, ICM, Paris, France.
Johann FaouziParis Brain Institute, ICM, Paris, France.
Benoît MartinParis Brain Institute, ICM, Paris, France.
Elina Thibeau-SutreParis Brain Institute, ICM, Paris, France.
Adam WildParis Brain Institute, ICM, Paris, France.
Manon AnsartParis Brain Institute, ICM, Paris, France.
Stanley DurrlemanParis Brain Institute, ICM, Paris, France.
Didier DormontParis Brain Institute, ICM, Paris, France.
Ninon BurgosParis Brain Institute, ICM, Paris, France.
Olivier ColliotParis Brain Institute, ICM, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We ranked third in the Predictive Analytics Competition (PAC) 2019 challenge by achieving a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.33 years in predicting age from T1-weighted MRI brain images. Our approach combined seven algorithms that allow generating predictions when the number of features exceeds the number of observations, in particular, two versions of best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP), support vector machine (SVM), two shallow convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and the famous ResNet and Inception V1. Ensemble learning was derived from estimating weights via linear regression in a hold-out subset of the training sample. We further evaluated and identified factors that could influence prediction accuracy: choice of algorithm, ensemble learning, and features used as input/MRI image processing. Our prediction error was correlated with age, and absolute error was greater for older participants, suggesting to increase the training sample for this subgroup. Our results may be used to guide researchers to build age predictors on healthy individuals, which can be used in research and in the clinics as non-specific predictors of disease status.

Indexed as

brain agedeep learningensemble learningmachine learningMRIstatistical learning

Identifiers

PMID33384629
PMCPMC7770104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.