ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2020
High resolution microcalcification signal profiles for dedicated breast CT.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study introduces a methodology for generating high resolution signal profiles of microcalcification (MC) grains for validating breast CT (bCT) systems. A physical MC phantom was constructed by suspending calcium carbonate grains in an agar solution emulating MCs in a fibroglandular tissue background. Additionally, small Teflon spheres (2.4 mm diameter) were embedded in the agar solution for the purpose of fiducial marking and assessment of segmentation accuracy. The MC phantom was imaged on a high resolution (34 μm) commercial small-bore μCT scanner at high dose, and the images were used as the gold-standard for assessing MC size and for generating high resolution signal profiles of each MC. High-dose bCT scans of the MC phantom suspended in-air were acquired using 1 × 1 binning mode (75 μm dexel pitch) by averaging three repeat scans to produce a single low-noise reconstruction of the MC phantom. The high resolution μCT volume data set was then registered with the corresponding bCT data set after correcting for the bCT system spatial resolution. Microcalcification signal profiles constructed using low-noise bCT images were found to be in good agreement with those generated using the μCT scanner with all differences < 10% within the VOI surrounding each MC. The MC signal profiles were used as detection templates for a non-prewhitening-matched-filter model observer for scans acquired in a realistic breast phantom at 3, 6, and 9 mGy mean glandular dose. MC detectability using signal templates derived from bCT were shown to be in good agreement with those generated using μCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.