Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33384434›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Long-term effects of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the acquisition and extinction of conditioned eyeblink responses.

Otilia Kimpel, Thomas Hulst, Giorgi Batsikadze, Thomas M Ernst, Michael A Nitsche, Dagmar Timmann, Marcus Gerwig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Otilia KimpelDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Thomas HulstDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Giorgi BatsikadzeDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Thomas M ErnstDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Michael A NitscheDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
Dagmar TimmannDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Marcus GerwigDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. marcus.gerwig@uni-due.de.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DEEssen University Hospital · DELeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been reported to enhance the acquisition of conditioned eyeblink responses (CR), a form of associative motor learning. The aim of the present study was to determine possible long-term effects of cerebellar tDCS on the acquisition and extinction of CRs. Delay eyeblink conditioning was performed in 40 young and healthy human participants. On day 1, 100 paired CS (conditioned stimulus)-US (unconditioned stimulus) trials were applied. During the first 50 paired CS-US trials, 20 participants received anodal cerebellar tDCS, and 20 participants received sham stimulation. On days 2, 8 and 29, 50 paired CS-US trials were applied, followed by 30 CS-only extinction trials on day 29. CR acquisition was not significantly different between anodal and sham groups. During extinction, CR incidences were significantly reduced in the anodal group compared to sham, indicating reduced retention. In the anodal group, learning related increase of CR magnitude tended to be reduced, and timing of CRs tended to be delayed. The present data do not confirm previous findings of enhanced acquisition of CRs induced by anodal cerebellar tDCS. Rather, the present findings suggest a detrimental effect of anodal cerebellar tDCS on CR retention and possibly CR performance.

Indexed as

BlinkingConditioning, ClassicalExtinction, PsychologicalTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultBrain WavesCerebellumFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33384434
PMCPMC7775427
OpenAlexW3115599035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.