Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33384410›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2021

Defining the 'HoneySweet' insertion event utilizing NextGen sequencing and a de novo genome assembly of plum (Prunus domestica).

Ann M Callahan, Tetyana N Zhebentyayeva, Jodi L Humann, Christopher A Saski, Kelsey D Galimba, Laura L Georgi, Ralph Scorza, Dorrie Main, Christopher D Dardick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Working smarter, not harder: silencingHorticulture research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The pan-plastome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  6. Spontaneous, Artificial, and Genome Editing-Mediated Mutations inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Robust Response toGenes · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ann M CallahanUSDA-ARS, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, Kearneysville, WV, 25430, USA. ann.callahan@usda.gov.
Tetyana N ZhebentyayevaThe Schatz Center for Tree Molecular Genetics, Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Jodi L HumannDepartment of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Christopher A SaskiPlant and Environmental Sciences Department, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Kelsey D GalimbaUSDA-ARS, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, Kearneysville, WV, 25430, USA.
Laura L GeorgiDepartment of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Ralph ScorzaUSDA-ARS, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, Kearneysville, WV, 25430, USA.
Dorrie MainPlant and Environmental Sciences Department, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Christopher D DardickUSDA-ARS, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, Kearneysville, WV, 25430, USA. chris.dardick@usda.gov.
Appalachian Fruit Research Laboratory · USClemson University · USPennsylvania State University · USWashington State University · US

Funding

California Dried Plum Board (CDPB) 2011United States Department of Agriculture | Agricultural Research Service (USDA Agricultural Research Service) in houseUnited States Department of Agriculture | Foreign Agricultural Service (USDA Foreign Agricultural Service) TASC 2009, 2010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'HoneySweet' plum (Prunus domestica) is resistant to Plum pox potyvirus, through an RNAi-triggered mechanism. Determining the precise nature of the transgene insertion event has been complicated due to the hexaploid genome of plum. DNA blots previously indicated an unintended hairpin arrangement of the Plum pox potyvirus coat protein gene as well as a multicopy insertion event. To confirm the transgene arrangement of the insertion event, 'HoneySweet' DNA was subjected to whole genome sequencing using Illumina short-read technology. Results indicated two different insertion events, one containing seven partial copies flanked by putative plum DNA sequence and a second with the predicted inverted repeat of the coat protein gene driven by a double 35S promoter on each side, flanked by plum DNA. To determine the locations of the two transgene insertions, a phased plum genome assembly was developed from the commercial plum 'Improved French'. A subset of the scaffolds (2447) that were >10 kb in length and representing, >95% of the genome were annotated and used for alignment against the 'HoneySweet' transgene reads. Four of eight matching scaffolds spanned both insertion sites ranging from 157,704 to 654,883 bp apart, however we were unable to identify which scaffold(s) represented the actual location of the insertion sites due to potential sequence differences between the two plum cultivars. Regardless, there was no evidence of any gene(s) being interrupted as a result of the insertions. Furthermore, RNA-seq data verified that the insertions created no new transcriptional units and no dramatic expression changes of neighboring genes.

Identifiers

PMID33384410
PMCPMC7775438
OpenAlexW3117574969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.