ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2021
Comparison of Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Therapy and Standard Breast-Conserving Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- RETRACTED: The impact of breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy on postoperative wound complications in patients with early breast cancer.International wound journal · 2024Article
- Is Instillational Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Peri-Prosthetic Infections of the Breast Effective? A Pilot Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Determination of Oncologic Outcomes, Satisfaction, and Psychosocial Well-being in Patients with Breast Cancer after Oncoplastic and Conventional Breast Conserving Surgery.World journal of plastic surgery · 2022Article
- [Application of three-pedicle reduction mammaplasty in breast cancer patients with moderate or greater breast hypertrophy and/or moderate-to-severe breast ptosis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oncoplastic breast-conserving therapy (OBCT) and SBCT (standard breast-conserving therapy) in breast cancer surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled 192 breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery during January 2015 to April 2018. The surgery strategies of OBCT and SBCT were performed according to the patients' condition. For measurement of surgical cosmetic effects, the Harris scale, the modified objective scores, and the subjective evaluation were all used. The basic clinical characteristics, intraoperative indices, postoperative complications, metastasis, and recurrence during the 2-year follow-up were recorded. RESULTS The mean surgical time was remarkably longer and the resected volume was markedly larger in the OBCT group than in the SBCT group. The excellent and good ratios of Harris scale, the modified objective scores, and the ratio of very satisfied and satisfied patients by subjective scale were all significantly higher in the OBCT group than in the SBCT group. The occurrence rates of seroma and poor incision healing were remarkably lower in the OBCT group. No significant difference was found for metastasis and recurrence. CONCLUSIONS OBCT had better cosmetic effects, fewer complications, and no adverse effects on metastasis and recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.